This site will work and look better in a browser that supports web standards, but it is accessible to any browser or Internet device.

“Christianity Through Jewish Eyes”

White House Renews National Emergency with Respect to Iran

November 13th, 2009

From The Israel Project


European Official: Size of Iranian Nuke Site Incompatible with Peaceful Program

President Barack Obama announced a continuation of a national emergency with respect to Iran Thursday (Nov. 12), citing the Islamic Republic’s “unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security, foreign policy, and economy of the United States.“[1] The national emergency was initially implemented Nov. 14, 1979 as an executive order in response to the Iran hostage crisis[2] in which Iranian revolutionaries held 52 workers at the U.S. Embassy in Tehran for 444 days.[3]
This announcement comes as a European official said Thursday that the size of Iran’s once-secret nuclear plant near Qom is incompatible with a peaceful enrichment program and instead suggests the facility is intended to develop weapons-grade uranium.[4] The official and other diplomats also revealed that construction on the site began seven years ago and that it is one year away from completion.[5]

The official’s statement echoes President Obama’s assertion that “The size and configuration of [the] facility is inconsistent with a peaceful program.”[6] Iran’s other enrichment plant at Natanz—also developed covertly—was discovered in 2002 after an Iranian dissident group revealed its existence.[7]

IAEA inspectors returned Oct. 29 to their Vienna headquarters after visiting the Qom site to determine whether the plant is part of a military nuclear program, and will report to the IAEA Board of Governors at its Nov. 26-27 meeting.[8] However, laboratory results from the inspection will not be available in time for the meeting, a delay that could slow diplomatic momentum against Iran’s nuclear program.[9]

As the world awaits more details of the inspection, following is a summary of IAEA reports on Iran.

Summary: International Atomic Energy Agency Reports on Iran

The International Atomic Energy Agency’s (IAEA) reports about Iran’s nuclear program have consistently found that Iran has failed – and continues to fail – to fully cooperate with the IAEA, pointing to a military dimension to Iran’s nuclear program.[1]

In its latest report, released on August 28, 2009, the International Atomic Energy Agency said it has pressed the Islamic Republic to clarify its uranium enrichment activities and reassure the world that it’s not trying to build an atomic weapon. The report was blunt: “Iran has not suspended its enrichment-related activities.” [2]

The IAEA reports that Iran refuses to provide the Agency with design information for a planned reactor at Darkhovin. The IAEA highlights Iran’s continued refusal to implement the updated version of its safeguards agreement. It notes that Iran is the only “state with significant nuclear activities which has a comprehensive safeguards agreement in force but is not implementing the provisions…”[3]

Iran has acknowledged working on a nuclear program for more than 20 years[4] and pursued a policy of concealment until October 2003, even denying in December 2002 that it had a nuclear weapons program.[5] Since then, Iran has failed to provide satisfactory information about and access to its program.[6] On Aug. 21, 2009, Iran granted IAEA inspectors access to its almost- completed Arak nuclear reactor, as well as increased monitoring of the Natanz uranium enrichment site.[7]

The reports have also found that Iran is continuously developing and operating new centrifuges[8] and enriching uranium in violation of several UN Security Council resolutions. This is a major concern for the IAEA.[9] Other findings conclude that Iran apparently is conducting secret studies to convert uranium dioxide into “green salt,” which can be used to make fuel for a nuclear reactor or fissile material for a bomb. Iran is also testing “high explosives” and redesigning the inner cone of the Shahab-3 missile re-entry head to accommodate a nuclear warhead, a subject of concern to the Agency.[10]

To further complicate matters after the contested election, there is confusion about who actually has authority to commit Iran to negotiations. “If all that raises the question of who in the Iranian government would be worth negotiating with, those doubts were reinforced the other day by the now-you-see-it, now-you-don’t remarks of Iran’s ambassador to the International Atomic Energy Agency, Ali Asghar Soltanieh. After state television reported that Mr. Soltanieh declared Iran ready ‘to take part in any negotiations with the West based on mutual respect,’ the ambassador announced a few hours later that he had told state TV no such thing. The flip-flop may have been just confusion, or it may have been a symptom of a key official serving more than one master in Tehran. Either way, it underscores the challenge for Washington in engaging with a regime of questionable legitimacy, dubious lines of authority and an uncertain grip on power,” The Washington Post wrote in an Aug. 27 editorial.[11]

Nuclear Weapon Breakout Calculations

As the Institute for Science and National Security has noted in previous reports, nuclear weapons “breakout capability” is a scenario that involves enriching LEU up to weapon-grade uranium. This could be accomplished within 3-6 months at either the Natanz facility or in a clandestine gas centrifuge facility. It provides a measure of Iran’s growing nuclear weapons capabilities. Whether Iran intends to pursue this approach is unknown. [12]

Timeline: IAEA Reports on Iran’s Nuclear Pursuits

August 28, 2009

  • The IAEA reports that Iran has significantly increased its ability to produce nuclear fuel over the summer, while slowing the pace at which it is enriching the uranium that could fuel nuclear weapons. If Iran enriches its current stockpile of low-enriched uranium it would have nearly two warheads’ worth of bomb fuel. The IAEA also said that Iran still refuses to turn over important documents linked to suspicions that its military was involved in the nuclear program, or to allow the agency to interview key personnel suspected of roles in weapons development.” [13]
  • The IAEA Report on Iran reports no substantive progress in resolving questions about possible military dimensions” to Iran’s nuclear program. The report does appear to rebut Iran’s charges that the documentation forming the basis of the alleged studies is forged. The report states that “the information contained in that documentation appears to have been derived from multiple sources over different periods of time, appears to be generally consistent, and is sufficiently comprehensive and detailed that it needs to be addressed by Iran with a view to removing the doubts which naturally arise, in light of all of the outstanding issues, about the exclusively peaceful nature of Iran’s nuclear programme.” The IAEA also chastises member states for placing undue constraints on the IAEA’s use of the information and “making it more difficult for the agency to conduct detailed discussions with Iran.”[14]

June 5, 2009[15]

  • In defiance of the decisions of the United Nations Security Council, Iran has continued its enrichment activities, including operation of its Fuel Enrichment Plant. Iran continues to make substantial progress on constructing and operating its centrifuges.[16]
  • Iran has produced 2,945 lbs. (1,339 kg) of low enriched uranium (UF6).[17]
  • Iran still refuses to grant access to the Iranian Nuclear Research Reactor.[18] Iran is now the only nation with significant nuclear activities which has a comprehensive safeguards agreement yet is not implementing some of its most significant aspects.[19]
  • Contrary to the request of the IAEA and the requirements of the Security Council, Iran refuses to cooperate with the IAEA on crucial issues pertaining to its program, one of many issues those points to a military dimension to the program.[20]

February 19, 2009[21]

  • Iran continues to deny the IAEA the ability to perform an inspection of the Iranian Nuclear Research Reactor, as requested by the Security Council. Furthermore, Iran has completed the construction of a dome over the reactor, making it impossible to monitor further construction inside the reactor using satellite imagery.[22]
  • Iran has produced 1,845 lbs. (839 kg) of low enriched uranium (UF6).[23]
  • In spite of the IAEA’s repeated requests to Iranian authorities, Iran continues to refuse access to relevant information, documentation, locations, and individuals which would enable the IAEA to determine whether the program is solely for peaceful purposes or if it has a military dimension.[24]

November 19, 2008[25]

  • Iran doesn’t permit the IAEA to carry out an inspection of the Iranian Nuclear Research Reactor originally scheduled for Oct. 26, 2008, in violation of Iran’s Safeguard Agreement. [26]
  • Iran has produced 1,386lbs. (630 kg) of low enriched uranium (UF6).[27]
  • A military dimension to Iran’s nuclear program is possible, as Iran still refuses to cooperate on multiple outstanding issues. [28]

September 15, 2008[29]

  • Contrary to the decisions of the Security Council, Iran has continued its enrichment activities, including operation of the Fuel Enrichment Plant and installation work on four new centrifuges.[30]
  • Iran has produced 1,056 lbs. (480 kg) of low enriched uranium (UF6).[31]
  • Iran continues to deny access to relevant documentation and individuals concerning the nature of its nuclear program. [32]

May 26, 2008[33]

  • Iran is making significant progress on developing and operating its centrifuges.[34]
  • Iran continues to withhold cooperation on numerous aspects of its nuclear program. A military dimension to the program is therefore possible.[35]
  • Iran’s “green salt project,” – efforts to convert uranium dioxide into fuel for a nuclear reactor – as well as high explosives testing and studies to redesign the inner cone of the Shahab-3 missile re-entry head to accommodate a nuclear warhead remain matters of serious concern.[36]

February 22, 2008[37]

  • Iran’s green salt project is a matter of serious concern and critical to an assessment of a possible military dimension to the nuclear program.[38]
  • Iran has not suspended its enrichment-related activities and has started the development of new-generation centrifuges.[39]

November 15, 2007[40]

  • Iran’s past and current enrichment program and its green salt project suggest military applications for Iran’s nuclear program; these are major issues relevant to the scope and nature of Iran’s nuclear program.[41]

August 27, 2007: IAEA-Iran Agreement[42]

Due to numerous outstanding concerns about Iran’s nuclear program considered of major importance by the IAEA, the Agency and Iran sign an agreement outlining plans on how to resolve them. Once that happens, the IAEA will have no further concerns pertaining to Iran’s nuclear program. The agreement is summed up as follows:

  • The IAEA and the Iranian government agree to prepare a “safeguards approach” paper for the Natanz Fuel Enrichment Plant. The paper will be compiled in accordance with Iran’s Comprehensive Safeguards Agreement. A draft of the paper was written and further discussed by the end of September 2007;[43]
  • Iran agrees to the IAEA’s request to visit the heavy water research reactor (IR40) site in Arak. The visit occurs July 30, 2007;[44]
  • Iran accepts the naming of five additional inspectors and agrees to issue one-year multiple-entry visas for 14 IAEA inspectors and staff;[45]
  • The issue of Iran’s plutonium experiments is satisfactorily resolved on Aug. 20, 2007;[46]
  • The agreement sets target dates for Iran to provide written answers on the still-outstanding issue of Iran’s centrifuges.[47]

February 22, 2007, [48] May 23, 2007[49] and August 30, 2007[50]

  • Iran still has not suspended its enrichment activities and is uncooperative. Additionally, the amount of information the IAEA is receiving has decreased since early 2006. The peaceful nature of Iran’s nuclear program is not confirmed.

November 14, 2006[51]

  • The Agency is unable to confirm the peaceful nature of Iran’s nuclear program due to a lack of cooperation.[52]

August 31, 2006[53]

April 28, 2006[55] and June 8, 2006[56]

  • The Agency is still unable to determine the full scale of Iran’s nuclear program due to Iran’s continuing lack of full cooperation.

February 27, 2006[57]

  • Iran is allegedly secretly studying the conversion of uranium dioxide into “green salt” which can be used to make fuel for a nuclear reactor or fissile material for a bomb. Iran is also supposedly conducting tests related to high explosives and the design of a missile re-entry vehicle to hold a nuclear warhead, all of which could have military nuclear dimensions.[58]

November 18, 2005[59]

  • A definite conclusion with respect to uranium contamination found at various locations is not possible due to a lack of full cooperation by Iran.[60]
  • Iran is overdue in showing full transparency about outstanding issues related to its enrichment program.[61]

September 2, 2005[62]

  • The results of an environmental sample analysis support Iran’s statement that uranium contamination found at various locations is of foreign origin. However, it is still not possible to establish a definitive conclusion about all of the contamination because there are two different types of contamination.[63]
  • The Agency has not yet verified the accuracy and completeness of Iran’s statements concerning its centrifuge program, due to lack of cooperation.[64]

November 15, 2004[65]

  • Iran has made substantial efforts during the past two decades to master an independent nuclear fuel cycle.[66]
  • Many aspects of Iran’s nuclear fuel cycle activities and experiments, particularly in the areas of uranium enrichment, uranium conversion and plutonium separation, were not declared to the Agency despite Iran’s obligations under the Safeguards Agreement.[67] The sources of uranium contamination found at various locations are not determined.[68]
  • The extent of Iran’s efforts to import, manufacture and use centrifuges is still not determined.[69]

September 1, 2004[70]

  • The sources of uranium contamination found at various locations, including on domestically manufactured components, are not determined.[71]
  • The extent to which Iran is trying to import, manufacture and use centrifuges is not fully determined.[72]

June 1, 2004[73]

  • Iran failed to provide adequate information concerning the origin of uranium contamination found at various locations in Iran.[74]
  • The extent of Iran’s efforts to import, manufacture and use centrifuges is not fully determined due to Iran’s lack of cooperation.[75]

February 24, 2004[76]

  • Uranium contamination found at the Kalaye Electric Company workshop and around Natanz are still major outstanding issues.[77]
  • Iran failed to clarify activities in relation to its centrifuges and laser isotope enrichment research.[78]

November 10, 2003[79]

  • Iran’s nuclear program consists of an almost complete front-end of a nuclear cycle. This includes uranium mining and milling, conversion, enrichment, fuel fabrication, heavy water production, a light water reactor, a heavy water research reactor and associated research and development facilities.[80]
  • Iran acknowledges that it has worked on developing a uranium centrifuge enrichment program for 18 years and a laser enrichment program for 12 years.[81]

August 26, 2003[82]

  • Iran has acknowledged that it carried out uranium conversion experiments in the early 1990s which it should have reported, in accordance with its obligations under the Safeguard Agreement.[83]
  • Highly enriched uranium is found in environmental samples taken around Natanz, although Iran stated that it had not carried out any enrichment.[84]

June 6, 2003[85]

  • Iran failed to meet its obligations under the Safeguards Agreement with respect to the reporting of nuclear material, and the subsequent processing and use of that material.[86]
  • Iran failed to declare the facilities where nuclear enrichment material was stored and processed.[87] Although the quantities of the material aren’t large, Iran’s lack of cooperation is a matter of concern.[88]



Footnotes for Press Release

[1] ”Continuation of the National Emergency with Respect to Iran,” White House Office of the Press Secretary, Nov. 12, 2009

[2] “Clinton Continues Iran National Emergency,” GlobalSecurity.org, March 4, 1998, 200http://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/library/news/iran/1998/98030404.htm

[3] “444 Days: America Reacts,” American Experience, http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/amex/carter/sfeature/sf_hostage.html, accessed Nov. 12, 2009

[4] Jahn, George, “Sources: Iran nuke plant 7 years old,” AP, Nov. 12, 2009, http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5jHz-Bz3Pa0Ivga_oNIvTbrBoIN7QD9BU3KKG1

[5] Jahn, George, “Sources: Iran nuke plant 7 years old,” AP, Nov. 12, 2009, http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5jHz-Bz3Pa0Ivga_oNIvTbrBoIN7QD9BU3KKG1

[6] “Statements by President Obama, French President Sarkozy, and British Prime Minister Brown on Iranian Nuclear Facility,” White House Office of the Press Secretary, Sept. 25, 2009, http://www.whitehouse.gov/the_press_office/Statements-By-President-Obama-French-President-Sarkozy-And-British-Prime-Minister-Brown-On-Iranian-Nuclear-Facility/

[7] Johnson, Zachary K., “Iran going nuclear, background to a crisis,” Frontline World, May 2005, http://www.pbs.org/frontlineworld/stories/iran403/background.html

[8] Tirone, Jonathan, “Iran Raises Uranium Output as Photos Show Need for Wider Checks,” Bloomberg News, Nov. 4, 2009, http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aMtzNb9WS83I&pos=9

[9] Gerami, Nima; Acton, James M., “Why a Month Matters,” Foreign Policy, Oct. 19, 2009, http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2009/10/19/why_a_month_matters

Footnotes for Summary: Intenrational Atomic Energy Agency Reports on Iran

[1] “Implementation of the NPT Safeguards Agreement and relevant provisions of Security Council resolutions 1737 (2006), 1747 (2007) and 1803 (2008) in the Islamic Republic of Iran,” International Atomic Energy Agency, F.28, May 26, 2008, http://www.iaea.org/Publications/Documents/Board/2008/gov2008-15.pdf

[2] Kole, William J., “UN: Questions About Military Aspects on Iran nukes,” The Associated Press, Aug. 28, 2009, http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090829/ap_on_re_mi_ea/un_nuclear_agency_iran

[3] Report on Iran, Institute for Science and International Security, by David Albright, Paul Brannen and Jacqueline Shire, August 28, 2009, pg. 3

[4] “Implementation of the NPT Safeguards Agreement in the Islamic Republic of Iran,” International Atomic Energy Agency, D.48, Aug. 26, 2003,http://www.iaea.org/Publications/Documents/Board/2003/gov2003-63.pdf

[5] “Iranian diplomat denies nuclear weapons program,” CNN, Dec. 13, 2002, http://edition.cnn.com/2002/WORLD/meast/12/13/zarif.transcript/index.html

[6] “Implementation of the NPT Safeguards Agreement in the Islamic Republic of Iran,” International Atomic Energy Agency, B.46, Feb. 27, 2006,http://www.iaea.org/Publications/Documents/Board/2006/gov2006-15.pdf

[7] Jahn, George, “Diplomats: Iran improves access to nuke activities,” AP, Aug. 21, 2009, http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5iijfYgMUu7W_-ZKg8BjH5QNTww5QD9A6O2MO2

[8] “Implementation of the NPT Safeguards Agreement and relevant provisions of Security Council resolutions 1737 (2006) and 1747 (2007) in the Islamic Republic of Iran,” International Atomic Energy Agency, F.56, Feb. 22, 2008, http://www.iaea.org/Publications/Documents/Board/2008/gov2008-4.pdf

[9] “Implementation of the NPT Safeguards Agreement in the Islamic Republic of Iran,” International Atomic Energy Agency, G.22, Aug. 30, 2007, http://www.iaea.org/Publications/Documents/Board/2007/gov2007-48.pdf

[10] “Implementation of the NPT Safeguards Agreement and relevant provisions of Security Council resolutions 1737 (2006), 1747 (2007) and 1803 (2008) in the Islamic Republic of Iran,” International Atomic Energy Agency, F.27, May 26, 2008, http://www.iaea.org/Publications/Documents/Board/2008/gov2008-15.pdf |

[11] “The Tumult in Tehran,“ Aug. 27. 2009, The Washington Post, http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/08/26/AR2009082603247.html

[12] Ibid

[13]Broad, William and Sanger, David, “Nuclear Agency Says Iran Has Bolstered Ability to Make Fuel but Slowed Its Output,” Aug. 28, 2009, http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/29/world/middleeast/29nuke.html?ref=todayspaper&pagewanted=print[13]

[14] Albright, David, Brannen, Paul and Shire, Jacqueline, “IAEA Report on Iran,” Institute for Science and International Security, Aug. 28, 2009, http://www.isis-online.org/publications/iran/Analysis_IAEA_Report.pdf

[15] “Implementation of the NPT Safeguards Agreement and relevant provisions of Security Council resolutions 1737 (2006), 1747 (2007) and 1803 (2008) and 1835 (2008) in the Islamic Republic of Iran,” International Atomic Energy Agency, June 5, 2009, http://www.iaea.org/Publications/Documents/Board/2009/gov2009-35.pdf

[16] “Implementation of the NPT Safeguards Agreement and relevant provisions of Security Council resolutions 1737 (2006), 1747 (2007) and 1803 (2008) and 1835 (2008) in the Islamic Republic of Iran,” International Atomic Energy Agency, A.2, June 5, 2009, http://www.iaea.org/Publications/Documents/Board/2009/gov2009-35.pdf

[17] I “Implementation of the NPT Safeguards Agreement and relevant provisions of Security Council resolutions 1737 (2006), 1747 (2007) and 1803 (2008) and 1835 (2008) in the Islamic Republic of Iran,” International Atomic Energy Agency, A.3, June 5, 2009, http://www.iaea.org/Publications/Documents/Board/2009/gov2009-35.pdf

[18] “Implementation of the NPT Safeguards Agreement and relevant provisions of Security Council resolutions 1737 (2006), 1747 (2007) and 1803 (2008) and 1835 (2008) in the Islamic Republic of Iran,” International Atomic Energy Agency, C.8, June 5, 2009, http://www.iaea.org/Publications/Documents/Board/2009/gov2009-35.pdf

[19] “Implementation of the NPT Safeguards Agreement and relevant provisions of Security Council resolutions 1737 (2006), 1747 (2007) and 1803 (2008) and 1835 (2008) in the Islamic Republic of Iran,” International Atomic Energy Agency, D.13, June 5, 2009, http://www.iaea.org/Publications/Documents/Board/2009/gov2009-35.pdf

[20] “Implementation of the NPT Safeguards Agreement and relevant provisions of Security Council resolutions 1737 (2006), 1747 (2007) and 1803 (2008) and 1835 (2008) in the Islamic Republic of Iran,” International Atomic Energy Agency, E.17-18, June 5, 2009, http://www.iaea.org/Publications/Documents/Board/2009/gov2009-35.pdf

[21] “Implementation of the NPT Safeguards Agreement and relevant provisions of Security Council resolutions 1737 (2006), 1747 (2007) and 1803 (2008) and 1835 (2008) in the Islamic Republic of Iran,” International Atomic Energy Agency, Feb. 19, 2009, http://www.iaea.org/Publications/Documents/Board/2009/gov2009-8.pdf

[22] “Implementation of the NPT Safeguards Agreement and relevant provisions of Security Council resolutions 1737 (2006), 1747 (2007) and 1803 (2008) and 1835 (2008) in the Islamic Republic of Iran,” International Atomic Energy Agency, C,9, Feb. 19, 2009, http://www.iaea.org/Publications/Documents/Board/2009/gov2009-8.pdf

[23] “Implementation of the NPT Safeguards Agreement and relevant provisions of Security Council resolutions 1737 (2006), 1747 (2007) and 1803 (2008) and 1835 (2008) in the Islamic Republic of Iran,” International Atomic Energy Agency, A.3, Feb. 19, 2009, http://www.iaea.org/Publications/Documents/Board/2009/gov2009-8.pdf

[24] “Implementation of the NPT Safeguards Agreement and relevant provisions of Security Council resolutions 1737 (2006), 1747 (2007) and 1803 (2008) and 1835 (2008) in the Islamic Republic of Iran,” International Atomic Energy Agency,E.15-17, Feb. 19, 2009, http://www.iaea.org/Publications/Documents/Board/2009/gov2009-8.pdf

[25] “Implementation of the NPT Safeguards Agreement and relevant provisions of Security Council resolutions 1737 (2006), 1747 (2007) and 1803 (2008) and 1835 (2008) in the Islamic Republic of Iran,” International Atomic Energy Agency, Nov. 19, 2008, http://www.iaea.org/Publications/Documents/Board/2008/gov2008-59.pdf

[26] “Implementation of the NPT Safeguards Agreement and relevant provisions of Security Council resolutions 1737 (2006), 1747 (2007) and 1803 (2008) and 1835 (2008) in the Islamic Republic of Iran,” International Atomic Energy Agency, C.9, Nov. 19, 2008, http://www.iaea.org/Publications/Documents/Board/2008/gov2008-59.pdf

[27] “Implementation of the NPT Safeguards Agreement and relevant provisions of Security Council resolutions 1737 (2006), 1747 (2007) and 1803 (2008) and 1835 (2008) in the Islamic Republic of Iran,” International Atomic Energy Agency, A.2, Nov. 19, 2008, http://www.iaea.org/Publications/Documents/Board/2008/gov2008-59.pdf

[28] “Implementation of the NPT Safeguards Agreement and relevant provisions of Security Council resolutions 1737 (2006), 1747 (2007) and 1803 (2008) and 1835 (2008) in the Islamic Republic of Iran,” International Atomic Energy Agency, E.15, Nov. 19, 2008, http://www.iaea.org/Publications/Documents/Board/2008/gov2008-59.pdf

[29] “Implementation of the NPT Safeguards Agreement and relevant provisions of Security Council resolutions 1737 (2006), 1747 (2007) and 1803 (2008) in the Islamic Republic of Iran,” International Atomic Energy Agency, Sept. 15, 2008, http://www.iaea.org/Publications/Documents/Board/2008/gov2008-38.pdf

[30] “Implementation of the NPT Safeguards Agreement and relevant provisions of Security Council resolutions 1737 (2006), 1747 (2007) and 1803 (2008) in the Islamic Republic of Iran,” International Atomic Energy Agency, A.2, Sept. 15, 2008, http://www.iaea.org/Publications/Documents/Board/2008/gov2008-38.pdf

[31] “Implementation of the NPT Safeguards Agreement and relevant provisions of Security Council resolutions 1737 (2006), 1747 (2007) and 1803 (2008) in the Islamic Republic of Iran,” International Atomic Energy Agency, A.2, Sept. 15, 2008, http://www.iaea.org/Publications/Documents/Board/2008/gov2008-38.pdf

[32] “Implementation of the NPT Safeguards Agreement and relevant provisions of Security Council resolutions 1737 (2006), 1747 (2007) and 1803 (2008) in the Islamic Republic of Iran,” International Atomic Energy Agency, F.23-25, Sept. 15, 2008, http://www.iaea.org/Publications/Documents/Board/2008/gov2008-38.pdf

[33] “Implementation of the NPT Safeguards Agreement and relevant provisions of Security Council resolutions 1737 (2006), 1747 (2007) and 1803 (2008) in the Islamic Republic of Iran,” International Atomic Energy Agency, F.27, May 26, 2008, http://www.iaea.org/Publications/Documents/Board/2008/gov2008-15.pdf

[34] Ibid. F.29.

[35] Ibid. F.28.

[36] Ibid. F.27.

[37] “Implementation of the NPT Safeguards Agreement and relevant provisions of Security Council resolutions 1737 (2006) and 1747 (2007) in the Islamic Republic of Iran,” International Atomic Energy Agency, Feb. 22, 2008, http://www.iaea.org/Publications/Documents/Board/2008/gov2008-4.pdf

[38] Ibid. F.54.

[39] Ibid. F.56.

[40] “Implementation of the NPT Safeguards Agreement and relevant provisions of Security Council resolutions 1737 (2006) and 1747 (2007) in the Islamic Republic of Iran,” International Atomic Energy Agency, Nov. 15, 2007, http://www.iaea.org/Publications/Documents/Board/2007/gov2007-58.pdf

[41] Ibid. F.41.

[42] “Communication dated 27 August 2007 from the Permanent Mission of the Islamic Republic of Iran to the Agency concerning the text of the ‘Understanding of the Islamic Republic of Iran and the IAEA on the Modalities of Resolution of the Outstanding Issues’,” International Atomic Energy Agency, Aug. 27, 2007, http://www.iaea.org/Publications/Documents/Infcircs/2007/infcirc711.pdf

[43] Ibid. I.1.A.

[44] Ibid. I.1.B.

[45] Ibid. I.1.C. and D.

[46] Ibid. I.2.A.

[47] Ibid. I.2.B.

[48] “Implementation of the NPT Safeguards Agreement and Relevant Provisions of Security Council Resolution 1737 (2006) in the Islamic Republic of Iran,” International Atomic Energy Agency, Feb. 22, 2007, http://www.iaea.org/Publications/Documents/Board/2007/gov2007-08.pdf

[49] “Implementation of the NPT Safeguards Agreement and Relevant Provisions of Security Council Resolutions in the Islamic Republic of Iran,” International Atomic Energy Agency, May 23, 2007, http://www.iaea.org/Publications/Documents/Board/2007/gov2007-22.pdf

[50] “Implementation of the NPT Safeguards Agreement in the Islamic Republic of Iran,” International Atomic Energy Agency, Aug. 30, 2008, http://www.iaea.org/Publications/Documents/Board/2007/gov2007-48.pdf

[51] “Implementation of the NPT Safeguards Agreement in the Islamic Republic of Iran,” International Atomic Energy Agency, Nov. 14, 2006, http://www.iaea.org/Publications/Documents/Board/2006/gov2006-64.pdf

[52] Ibid. G.21.

[53] “Implementation of the NPT Safeguards Agreement in the Islamic Republic of Iran,” International Atomic Energy Agency, Aug. 31, 2006, http://www.iaea.org/Publications/Documents/Board/2006/gov2006-53.pdf

[54] Ibid. G.28.

[55] “Implementation of the NPT Safeguards Agreement in the Islamic Republic of Iran,” International Atomic Energy Agency, April 28, 2006, http://www.iaea.org/Publications/Documents/Board/2006/gov2006-27.pdf

[56] “Implementation of the NPT Safeguards Agreement in the Islamic Republic of Iran,” International Atomic Energy Agency, June 8, 2006, http://www.iaea.org/Publications/Documents/Board/2006/gov2006-38.pdf

[57] “Implementation of the NPT Safeguards Agreement in the Islamic Republic of Iran,” International Atomic Energy Agency, Feb. 27, 2006, http://www.iaea.org/Publications/Documents/Board/2006/gov2006-15.pdf

[58] Ibid. A6.38.

[59] “Implementation of the NPT Safeguards Agreement in the Islamic Republic of Iran,” International Atomic Energy Agency, Nov. 18, 2005, http://www.iaea.org/Publications/Documents/Board/2005/gov2005-87.pdf

[60] Ibid. B.20.

[61] Ibid. B.21.

[62] “Implementation of the NPT Safeguards Agreement in the Islamic Republic of Iran,” International Atomic Energy Agency, Sept. 2, 2005, http://www.iaea.org/Publications/Documents/Board/2005/gov2005-67.pdf

[63] Ibid. C.45.

[64] Ibid. C.46.

[65] “Implementation of the NPT Safeguards Agreement in the Islamic Republic of Iran,” International Atomic Energy Agency, Nov. 15, 2004, http://www.iaea.org/Publications/Documents/Board/2004/gov2004-83.pdf

[66] Ibid. C.106.

[67] Ibid. C.107.

[68] Ibid. C.108.

[69] Ibid.

[70] “Implementation of the NPT Safeguards Agreement in the Islamic Republic of Iran,” International Atomic Energy Agency, Sept. 1, 2004, http://www.iaea.org/Publications/Documents/Board/2004/gov2004-60.pdf

[71] Ibid. C.58.

[72] Ibid.

[73] “Implementation of the NPT Safeguards Agreement in the Islamic Republic of Iran,” International Atomic Energy Agency, June 1, 2004, http://www.iaea.org/Publications/Documents/Board/2004/gov2004-34.pdf

[74] Ibid. C.46.

[75] Ibid. C.47.

[76] “Implementation of the NPT Safeguards Agreement in the Islamic Republic of Iran,” International Atomic Energy Agency, Feb. 24, 2004, http://www.iaea.org/Publications/Documents/Board/2004/gov2004-11.pdf

[77] Ibid. C.75.

[78] Ibid. C.76.

[79] “Implementation of the NPT Safeguards Agreement in the Islamic Republic of Iran,” International Atomic Energy Agency, Nov.10, 2003, http://www.iaea.org/Publications/Documents/Board/2003/gov2003-75.pdf

[80] Ibid. D.45.

[81] Ibid. D.46.

[82] “Implementation of the NPT Safeguards Agreement in the Islamic Republic of Iran,” International Atomic Energy Agency, Aug. 26, 2003, http://www.iaea.org/Publications/Documents/Board/2003/gov2003-63.pdf

[83] Ibid. D.48.

[84] Ibid. D.50.

[85] “Implementation of the NPT Safeguards Agreement in the Islamic Republic of Iran,” International Atomic Energy Agency, June 6, 2003, http://www.iaea.org/Publications/Documents/Board/2003/gov2003-40.pdf

[86] Ibid. D.32.

[87] Ibid.

[88] Ibid. D.33.


The Israel Project is an international non-profit organization devoted to educating the press and the public about Israel while promoting security, freedom and peace. The Israel Project provides journalists, leaders and opinion-makers accurate information about Israel. The Israel Project is not related to any government or government agency.

Palestinian elections called off, Abbas to remain in power

November 13th, 2009
www.IsraelToday.co.il

The head of the Palestinian Central Elections Committee on Thursday announced that Palestinian legislative and presidential elections cannot be held on January 24, as declared by Palestinian leader Mahmoud Abbas.

The committee chief informed Abbas of his decision earlier in the day. He blamed the inability to hold elections on Hamas, which had threatened to punish any residents of the Gaza Strip that dared to vote in the poll.

Many in Israel viewed Thursday’s announcement as just part of a larger ruse by Abbas to remain in power after telling the world he would not seek reelection due to what he called Israel’s inability to make peace. Abbas will now be viewed as the “reluctant moderate” leader who will only stick around as long as Israel is pressured into making the kind of concessions that will keep him happy.

Golan, Water, and Peace

November 13th, 2009

www.IsraelToday.co.il

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Wednesday, Nov 11 passed a message to Syrian President Bashar Assad via French President Nicolas Sarkozy urging an immediate resumption of peace talks between the two Middle East nations.

Arabic news network al-Arabiya cited “knowledgeable sources” as saying that during their meeting in Paris, Netanyahu told Sarkozy he is prepared to withdraw from the Golan Heights for the sake of a peace deal with Syria. According to the report, Netanyahu asked Sarkozy to passed that message on when he met with Assad on Friday.

Netanyahu’s office immediately responded by admitting that a message had been transmitted to Assad via Sarkozy, but firmly rejecting that the Israeli leader had offered to surrender the Golan. The Prime Minister’s Office refused to release further details regarding the peace overture.

A day before traveling to Paris himself, Assad claimed that he, too, is ready to restart negotiations with Israel without preconditions, though in the past the Syrian leader has refused direct talks with Israel without a prior commitment to meet Syrian territorial demands.

Assad also revealed that even if he enters talks with Israel, they will be accompanied by continued support for terrorist violence against Israel.

“The essence of peace is not just negotiations but rather, resistance as well,” Assad was quoted as saying by official Syrian media.

Meanwhile, Arab affairs expert Prof. Moshe Sharon warned in an interview with Arutz 7 Radio that all the Syrians want is to take Israel’s water.

“The Syrians want us to sign a peace agreement with them so that they can draw Sea of Galilee water from us,” said Sharon. “They don’t want peace; they want water.”

Iraq Passes Crucial Election Law

November 11th, 2009

By Timothy Williams and Sa’ad Izzi, www.NYTimes

BAGHDAD — After weeks of political stalemate, Iraq approved a law on Sunday to administer a critical national election in January, a significant milestone for its fragile democracy and a step that will allow the rapid withdrawal of American combat forces early next year.

Nuri Kamal al-Maliki

Nuri Kamal al-Maliki

The election, only the second national vote since the fall of Saddam Hussein, will be a crucial step toward popular sovereignty and stability in Iraq. But the election law had been stymied by a political battle over the northern province of Kirkuk, claimed by Kurds, Arabs and Turkmens, each of whom hoped electoral power would give them control of the region’s oil wealth.

The compromise reached Sunday, which satisfied all three groups, was hailed by Iraqi and American leaders as a triumph for Iraq’s emerging democracy and a demonstration of Parliament’s ability to resolve sticky sectarian disputes for the national benefit.

“Accomplishing this law is not a victory for anyone in particular, but a victory for the entire Iraqi people,” said Faryad Raundozi, a member of Parliament’s Kurdish Alliance.

The United States had said that a delay of the election could set back the scheduled withdrawal of American combat troops.

On Sunday, President Obama called the Parliament’s action “a significant breakthrough” that would ease fears about an American military withdrawal.

“This agreement advances the political progress that can bring lasting peace and unity to Iraq, and allow for the orderly and responsible transition of American combat troops out of Iraq by next September,” Mr. Obama said at the White House.

Prime Minister Nuri Kamal al-Maliki of Iraq said in a statement that the passage of the law had been a “historic victory of the will of the people” and a “strong response” to those seeking to undermine Iraq’s democracy.

American military commanders have said they intend to begin a rapid withdrawal of the 120,000 American troops still in Iraq after the election. The United States has pledged to withdraw all combat forces from Iraq by the end of next August, leaving about 50,000 troops in an advisory and support role. All American troops are scheduled to leave the country by the end of 2011.

After the vote, the American ambassador to Iraq, Christopher R. Hill, said the withdrawal would proceed as planned. “What is important is that with the election law, we are very much on schedule for the drawdown,” he said.

American and Iraqi officials hope the election will cement democracy here at a time when many people have grown discontented with their leadership and fed up with continued violence, corruption and high unemployment.

The previous parliamentary vote, in 2005, was boycotted by many Sunni Arabs, an act that allowed the insurgency to fester and fueled subsequent sectarian bloodshed. This time, each of the major political parties and Iraqi’s major religious and ethnic groups have all said they will participate.

Khalid Ataya, the deputy speaker of Parliament, told members of the legislature that they were taking a momentous step in the country’s young democratic history. “The Parliament has done something important for the people of Iraq,” he said. “This is a big blow to terrorists.”

As an indication of the election’s importance to the United States, Mr. Hill was seen shuttling back and forth between the offices of various political parties all day Sunday in an effort to pressure them to reach a deal.

“Go upstairs and vote!” he shouted at a pair of slow-moving lawmakers as they climbed a set of stairs to the chamber before the session.

The election had been scheduled for Jan. 16, but as the parliamentary session ended late Sunday, officials said it appeared that it would be delayed by a few days to give election officials time to print ballots and to make other preparations.

For weeks, the legislature had wrestled with how to determine voter eligibility in Kirkuk, which sits on billions of barrels of oil. The issue threatened to undermine the election, and Parliament’s inability to resolve it had become a symbol of Iraq’s political dysfunction.

Tens of thousands of Kurds were forced out of Kirkuk by Saddam Hussein, who replaced them with Arabs in order to tighten his grip on the region’s oil. Since the United States-led invasion that ousted Mr. Hussein in 2003, thousands of Kurds have moved back.

Arabs and Turkmens in Kirkuk had favored using voter registration lists from 2004 or 2005, while Kurds wanted to use voter rolls from 2009 that reflected their substantially higher numbers.

The agreement reached Sunday, brokered by the United States and the United Nations, will use voter lists from 2009, but if the number of eligible voters in a particular area is deemed by members of Parliament to be suspiciously high, a committee overseen by the United Nations will be formed to determine whether fraud has occurred, according to a draft of the law.

The compromise satisfied each of the groups competing for dominance in Kirkuk. “We have passed a stage, a crisis, and no one is a loser,” said Abbas al-Bayti, a Turkmen legislator.

Osama al-Najafi, an Arab legislator, said: “There will be no injustice for the people of Kirkuk. This is a great victory for their historical rights.”

The election will also allow voters to choose individual candidates as part of an “open list,” as opposed to the closed-list ballot in which voters pick political parties, who in turn choose people to occupy seats in Parliament.

The 2005 election used a closed list, which helped protect candidates from assassination, but it strengthened organized parties rather than individual candidates and was unpopular with voters.

The new law, which also reserves a quarter of the next Parliament’s seats for women, must be approved by President Jalal Talabani and his two vice presidents, which is expected to happen in a few days.

Under the Constitution, the election must take place before the end of January, but an important Shiite religious observance comes during the last week of that month.

Hamdia al-Hussaini, a member of the Independent High Electoral Commission, the Iraqi government agency that oversees elections, said Sunday that the vote would have to be delayed at least several days past the scheduled date of Jan. 16.

“It can’t be held on the 16th because Parliament was late in passing the law,” she said.

On Sunday, some Sunni Arab members of Parliament said they were unhappy about interference with the legislation by the United States, particularly the American insistence that elections not be delayed.

“Unfortunately, the Americans are insisting on certain dates more than they are insisting on the objectivity of their decisions,” said Saleh al-Mutlaq, a Sunni member of Parliament.

Parliament has the final decision about when to hold the election.

Iran Charges American Hikers With Spying

November 10th, 2009
Sarah Shourd, Shane Bauer, and Josh Fattal

Sarah Shourd, Shane Bauer, and Josh Fattal

By Huw Borland, News.Sky.com

Iran has charged three detained US citizens with espionage, the Islamic republic’s judiciary has told reporters.

The foreigners were arrested after they strayed into Iran, from northern Iraq, at the end of July.

“We believe strongly that there is no evidence to support any charge whatsoever,” US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said on a visit to Berlin.

Shane Bauer, 27, Sarah Shourd, 31, and Josh Fattal, 27, crossed the border accidentally, their families have insisted.

But Tehran general prosecutor Abbas Jafari Dolatabadi told news agency IRNA: “The three are charged with espionage. Investigations continue into the three detained Americans in Iran.”

Under Iran’s Islamic sharia law, espionage is punishable by death.

The republic’s President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad suggested in September that the detainees’ release might be linked to the release of Iranian diplomats he said were being held by US troops in Iraq.

But America has kept urging Tehran to release the trio, calling for “compassion” towards them.

Some Iranian authorities have linked the hikers’ illegal entry to violence that erupted after the country’s disputed presidential election in June.

Mr Ahmadinejad’s re-election sparked the republic’s worst unrest since the 1979 Islamic revolution.

Authorities deny vote-rigging and portrayed the dissent as a foreign-backed bid to undermine the Islamic state.

On Wednesday, police clashed with supporters of Iran’s opposition leader Mirhossein Mousavi in Tehran.

Wednesday's anti-US rally in Iran

Wednesday's anti-US rally in Iran

Crowds had used anti-US rallies to revive the protests against the clerical establishment after June’s vote.

The detainees’ families have been campaigning for their release at freethehikers.org.

Seizure of Iran Weapons Shipment Shows Proof of Ongoing Terrorism Support

November 8th, 2009

By Jennifer Laszlo Mizrahi and Jennifer Packer,   www.TheIsraelProject.org


Photos of Israeli naval force intercepting ship with 500 tons of arms (Israel Ministry of Foreign Affairs)

A cargo ship filled with tons of Iranian weaponry en route to Iran-backed terror groups that was intercepted Tuesday (Nov. 3) 100 miles (161 km) from Israel’s coast provides further evidence of the Islamic Republic’s status as the world’s largest state sponsor of terrorism. The ship, carrying hundreds of tons of advanced weaponry and missiles,[1] including Katyusha rockets, assault rifles, mortar shells, grenades, and anti-aircraft platforms, was to be delivered to the Iran-backed terrorist group Hezbollah.[2]

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Thursday (Nov. 5) said Iran’s attempted shipment of arms to terrorists – and the Islamic Republic’s intent to kill Israeli civilians — was a war crime the UN Security Council should investigate. “Their goal was… to kill as many civilians as possible,” Netanyahu said. The weapons shipment also constitutes yet another breach of UN Security Council resolutions 1747 and 1701, which forbid the Islamic Republic from exporting or trading weapons.

Also on Nov. 3, Israeli military intelligence revealed that the Iranian-backed terrorist group Hamas successfully tested a rocket with a range of up to 37 miles (60 km), which places Israel’s second largest city Tel Aviv within firing range.[3] Hamas also possesses other Iranian-manufactured rockets like the Fajr-3, which has a range of up to 29 miles (47 km).[4]

Since 2001, Iran-backed terrorist groups have fired over 12,000 rockets and mortars from Gaza into Israel.[5] Hezbollah launched over 4,000 rockets into Israel in 2006 during Israel’s defensive war against Hezbollah, also known as the Second Lebanon War, and has stockpiled more than 20,000 rockets in southern Lebanon since the end of the war.[6]

Following is important background information about Iran’s financial support of terrorism worldwide.

Iran: Leading State Sponsor of Terror Across the Globe

Iran is widely recognized as the world’s leading state sponsor of international terrorism.[7] Both directly and indirectly, Iran funds, trains and arms groups that share the regime’s stated goal of destroying Israel and the West, as well as overthrowing regimes in Muslim countries such as Egypt and Saudi Arabia[8]. These groups include Al Qaeda, Hezbollah, Palestinian Islamic Jihad and Hamas.[9] Iran also provides support to insurgent groups in Lebanon, Iraq and Afghanistan which have inflicted casualties on American, British, Australian and other multinational forces.[10]

Iran is expanding its terror network beyond the Middle East, using Hezbollah and splinter groups of Iran’s Revolutionary Guard to recruit and train sleeper cells in foreign countries.[11] The terror network that Iran has created and continues to sustain, combined with the regime’s determination to become a nuclear power, is a serious international security issue and a growing global concern.[12]

FBI officials have also noted that Hezbollah has a sizeable presence in the United States, and suspects that Hezbollah may be planning to activate sleeper cells in the New York City area.[13]

Iran poses different threats to nations and regions across the globe.

Middle East

The terrorist group Hezbollah, which operates primarily out of Lebanon, is one of Tehran’s primary weapons against Israel and Western interests in the region. Iran helped found, organize and train Hezbollah and gives the group over $200 million a year,[14] in addition to an estimated $300 million after the war with Israel in 2006.[15] It also continues to provide arms to the group,[16] despite the demands of U.N. Security Council Resolution 1701. [17]

Since Israel’s defensive war against Hezbollah in 2006, Iran has replenished Hezbollah’s arsenal of artillery rockets, and has supplied more advanced anti-tank weapons and surface-to-air missiles.[18] At least 4,500 Hezbollah operatives have received intensive training from Iran.[19] In August 2009, Egypt intercepted a group of Hezbollah militant cells planning the assassination of Israel’s ambassador to Egypt, as well as its link to another group planning on targeting Israeli tourists to Jordan.[20] That same month, Egypt was hit by a barrage of mortars launched by militant Islamic groups in Gaza.[21]

Iran also supports Palestinian terror groups opposed to a peaceful solution to the Palestinian-Israeli conflict.[22] From 1993-2006, Iran provided approximately $30 million in annual subsidies to Hamas.[23] Since Hamas’ electoral victory in 2006, Iran has transferred several hundred million dollars annually to Hamas.[24] The Iranian Revolutionary Guard has trained approximately 950 Hamas terrorists in rocket and bomb construction, tactical warfare, weapons operation and sniper tactics.[25]

Iran also provides the vast majority of Hamas’ weaponry.[26] Since Israel’s defensive Operation Cast Lead in Gaza, Iran has supplied Hamas with advanced weaponry, including dozens of Iranian-produced 122mm Grad rockets which have significantly increased the range of Hamas’ rocket arsenal.[27] During the operation, the Iranians claimed that more than 70,000 Iranian college students from universities throughout Iran volunteered to serve as suicide bombers to carry out attacks against Israel. The rush of volunteerism came after Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei delivered a religious decree stating that anyone who carried out an attack against Israel on behalf of Palestinians in Gaza would be considered a martyr.[28]

In 2002, the Israeli Navy intercepted “Karin A,” a ship carrying 50 tons of advanced weaponry and rockets supplied by Iran and Hezbollah that was bound for Palestinian terrorist groups through Gaza’s waterway.[29]

Iraq

In Iraq, Iran has fomented violence by giving insurgents about $3 million monthly and providing arms and training for them.[30] Iranian-supplied explosively formed penetrators (EFP’s) are a serious concern for U.S. soldiers; the weapons were responsible for 18 percent of U.S. combat deaths in the last quarter of 2006, and 30 percent in -dominated areas.[31] In July 2007, Iran planned an operation that killed five American servicemen, according to the U.S. Army.[32] Shia groups now use Fajr-3 rockets bearing the markings of Iran’s Revolutionary Guard dated 2007, and Hezbollah also uses the Fajr-3.[33] Attacks on U.S. bases have included the use of these rockets as well.[34] Iran has sought to provoke sectarian violence in Iraq, and to that end, arms Sunni groups as well.[35] Iran has sent revolutionary guard units to Iraq to train Shia militia fighters,[36] and sent explosive-laden motorcycles across the border.[37]

Afghanistan

Iran arms the Taliban’s campaign against NATO forces and civilians in Afghanistan even as it publicly supports Hamid Karzai’s government.[38] Iran provides the Taliban with 107mm mortars, rocket-propelled grenades, C-4 explosives and small arms.[39] Iran also gave the Taliban surface-to-air missiles, which they use against British troops.[40] Iran is the main supporter of Hekmatyar,[41] a major warlord and drug trafficker.

Europe and beyond

Europe serves as a popular location for Hezbollah operatives to conduct fundraising activities, accruing an estimated $198 million a year.[42] E.U. officials have identified 900 Hezbollah terrorists residing in Germany and sleeper cells in 20 E.U. nations.[43] Hezbollah cells are using key European capitals as intelligence-gathering centers. In 2008, evidence suggested Hezbollah had planned terrorist attacks in Rome and Paris, as well as the kidnapping of major figures.[44]

Iran has worked directly and through proxies, including small groups linked to the Iranian Revolutionary Guard, to recruit potential suicide bombers to attack Israel, Europe and the United States. Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has praised martyrdom as an “eternal art.”[45] The Committee for the Commemoration of Martyrs of the Global Islamic Campaign, backed by the regime and linked to the Iranian Revolutionary Guard, has reportedly enlisted 40,000 people to carry out suicide attacks.[46]

Iran maintains terrorist training camps within its borders and abroad. Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Quds Force, an extra-territorial arm of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard, operates 20 known terrorist training camps and centers.[47] Hamas, Hezbollah and groups in Iraq send fighters to camps in Iran for months and even years of intensive training. Through Hezbollah, Iran trains insurgents in Iraq.[48]

During the 1990s, Iran sent arms to the Muslim-led Bosnian government, a move violating a United Nations embargo on all sides of the civil war.[49] Additionally, between 2004 and 2007 it was reported that over 300 Iranian operatives had entered Bosnia-Herzegovina.[50]

Latin and South America

Hezbollah also carried out terrorist attacks in Argentina,[51] and killed 241 Americans in the 1983 suicide bombing of the Marine barracks in Beirut.[52] On Aug. 21, Iranian President Ahmadinejad nominated Ahmad Vahidi, wanted for his part in planning the 1994 Argentinean attack that killed 85 at a Jewish community center, as defense minister.[53]

Hezbollah is very active in Venezuela, Bolivia and Uruguay, as well as other Latin American countries, seeking to plan new attacks against Israeli or Jewish targets in the continent.[54] In 2009, the anti-American Hugo Chavez of Venezuela continued to strengthen his ties with Iran.[55] Additionally, Hezbollah has been using Mexican smuggling routes, to smuggle drugs and people into the United States, in order to bring in money to finance terrorist operations.[56]

Attacks on U.S. and British citizens

In 1988, an Iran-backed terrorist organization was responsible for the kidnapping, torture and murder of Col. William Higgins, a U.S. Marine officer serving under a UN mandate in Lebanon.[57] Additionally, Iran has placed a death warrant on British author Salman Rushdie, attempted to assassinate him in 1989 and has kept a $2.5 million bounty on him.[58]

Asia

North Korea and Iran have maintained strong ties. In 2007, the two countries signed a cultural and scientific exchange plan.[59] Additionally, North Korea has shared its nuclear technology know-how with Iran[60] and North Korea has provided arms and training to Hezbollah through this relationship.[61] Such ties have also involved rocket experiments; in May 2009, a Scud missile reportedly tested by North Korea, Syria and Iran killed more than 20 people in a Syrian market.[62]

********************

Footnotes:

[1] Katz, Yaakov, “Over 60 tons of advanced arms and missiles found on vessel” The Jerusalem Post, Nov. 4, 2009,
http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1256799077483&pagename=JPost/JPArticle/ShowFull

[2] Katz, Yaakov, “Over 60 tons of advanced arms and missiles found on vessel” The Jerusalem Post, Nov. 4, 2009,
http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1256799077483&pagename=JPost/JPArticle/ShowFull

[3] Waghorn, Dominic, “Hamas Rocket ‘Could Hit Tel Aviv From Gaza’,” Sky News, Nov. 4, 2009,
http://news.sky.com/skynews/Home/World-News/Israel-Claims-Hamas-Has-Test-Fired-Rocket-That-Could-Hit-Tel-
Aviv-From-Gaza-Hamas-Is-Denying-Claims/Article/200911115433590?lpos=World_News_First_World_News_Article_Teaser_Region_3&lid=ARTICLE_15433590_Israel_Claims_
Hamas_Has_Test_Fired_Rocket_That_Could_Hit_Tel_Aviv_From_Gaza%2C_Hamas_Is_Denying_Claims
;
Teibel, Amy, “Israel, PM accuse Iran of war crime over arms ship,” Associated Press via The Baltimore Sun, Nov. 5, 2009,
http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/nation-world/sns-ap-ml-israel-arms-boat,0,251054.story

[4] “Gaza rockets can now hit Tel Aviv,” UPI, Nov. 3, 2009,
http://www.upi.com/Business_News/Security-Industry/2009/11/03/Gaza-rockets-can-now-hit-Tel-Aviv/UPI-73651257283344/

[5] “The Ministry of Foreign Affairs Gaza Facts,” Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Nov. 4, 2009. http://www.mfa.gov.il/GazaFacts/

[6] “Explosions at Two Hezbollah Arms Caches in villages in South Lebanon” Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center. Oct. 14, 2009, http://www.terrorism-info.org.il/malam_multimedia/English/eng_n/html/hezbollah_e0142.htm;
“Behind the Headlines: The Second Lebanon War – Three years later,”  Israel Ministry of Foreign Affairs, July 12, 2009, http://www.mfa.gov.il/MFA/About+the+Ministry/Behind+the+Headlines/The-Second-Lebanon-War-Three-years-later-12-Jul-2009.htm

[7] “State Sponsors of Terrorism,” U.S. Department of State, Apr. 30, 2009,
http://www.state.gov/s/ct/rls/crt/2008/122436.htm

[8] Mansharof, Y., “Calls in Iran to Topple Egyptian, Saudi Regimes,” Middle East Media Research Institute No. 479, Dec. 12, 2008, http://www.memri.org/bin/latestnews.cgi?ID=IA47908

[9] O’Toole, Pam, “Rice: Iran is terrorism ‘banker’,” BBC News, Feb. 17, 2006,
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/4722498.stm, accessed July 7, 2006

[10] Harding, Thomas, “Taliban ‘using missiles from Iran to target British troops,” The Daily Telegraph, May 22, 2007; Gordon, Michael R.; Shane, Scott, “Behind U.S. Pressure On Iran, Long-Held Worry Over A Deadly Device In Iraq,” The New York Times, March 27, 2007

[11] Levitt, Mathew A., “Islamic extremism in Europe,” Testimony to the Committee on International Relations Subcommittee on Europe and Emerging Threats, United States House of Representatives, April 7, 2005,
http://wwwa.house.gov/international_relations/109/lev042705.pdf

[12] Thomas, George, “Iran trains ‘ultimate martyrs,’” Christian World News, May 12, 2006,
http://www.cbn.com/CBNnews/CWN/051206Iran.asp;
International Institute for Strategic Studies, “Iran’s nuclear programme,” Strategic Comments, Volume 12, Issue 1, Feb. 2006

[13] Thomas, Pierre, “Some Experts Fear Hezbollah Attack in the United States,” ABC News, July 28, 2006, http://abcnews.go.com/GMA/Mideast/story?id=2246657;
“Hezbollah may activate sleeper cells,” United Press International, May 22, 2006, http://www.upi.com/Top_News/2006/05/22/Hezbollah-may-activate-sleeper-cells/UPI-82771148307908/

[14] “State Sponsors of Terrorism,” U.S. Department of State, Apr. 30, 2009,
http://www.state.gov/s/ct/rls/crt/2008/122436.htm

[15] Partlow, Joshua, “U.S.: Iran, Hezbollah Training Iraqi Militants,” The Washington Post, July 2, 2007,
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/07/02/AR2007070200174.html?hpid=topnews

[16] Rotella, Sebastian, “In Lebanon, Hezbollah arms stockpile, bigger, deadlier,” The Los Angeles Times, May 4, 2008,http://articles.latimes.com/2008/may/04/world/fg-hezbollah4

[17] U.N. Security Council Resolution No. 1701, Section 15,
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/4785963.stm

[18] Hughes, Robin, “Iran Replenishes Hizbullah’s Arms Inventory,” Jane’s Defence Weekly, Jan. 3, 2007

[19] Fisk, Robert, “Hizbollah turns to Iran for new weapons to wage war on Israel,” The Independent, Apr. 8, 2008, http://www.independent.co.uk/opinion/commentators/fisk/hizbollah-turns-to-iran-for-new-weapons-to-wage-war-on-israel-805763.html

[20] Shiffer, Shimon, “Hezbollah suspected of setting camp in Venezuela,” YnetNews, Aug. 13, 2009,
http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3761491,00.html

[21] “Rafah: Gazan escapes clashes to Egypt, child hit by bullet,” Ma’an News Agency, Aug. 16, 2009, http://www.maannews.net/eng/ViewDetails.aspx?ID=219187

[22] Country Reports on Terrorism, Chapter 6- State Sponsors of Terror Overview-Iran,” U.S. Department of State Web site, April 28, 2006,
http://www.state.gov/s/ct/rls/crt/2005/64337.htm

[23] Wurmser, Meyrav, “Iran-Hamas Alliance,” Hudson Institute, Oct. 4, 2007,
https://www.hudson.org/index.cfm?fuseaction=publication_details&id=5167

[24] “Iranian Support of Hamas,” Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center, Jan. 12, 2009, p. 20,
http://www.terrorism-info.org.il/malam_multimedia/English/eng_n/pdf/iran_e004.pdf

[25] “Senior Hamas operative figure tells London Sunday Times’ Gaza Strip correspondent about Iranian and Syria military aid, detailing the training received by hundreds of Hamas terrorist operatives and describing the transmission to Hamas of Iranian technical know-how for the manufacture of rockets and IED,” The Intelligence and Terrorist Information Center, Mar. 17, 2008,
http://www.terrorisminfo.org.il/malam_multimedia/English/eng_n/html/hamas_160308e.htm;
Colvin, Marie, “Hamas wages Iran’s proxy war on Israel,” The Times, Mar. 9, 2008,
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/middle_east/article3512014.ece

[26] Cohen, Yoram and Matthew Levitt, “Hamas Arms Smuggling: Egypt’s Challenge,” The Washington Institute for Near East Policy, Policy Watch #34, Mar. 2, 2009,
http://www.washingtoninstitute.org/templateC05.php?CID=3020

[27] Cohen, Yoram and Matthew Levitt, “Hamas Arms Smuggling: Egypt’s Challenge,” The Washington Institute for Near East Policy, Policy Watch #34, Mar. 2, 2009,
http://www.washingtoninstitute.org/templateC05.php?CID=3020

[28] “Iran says 70,000 volunteer for Israel fight,” The Associated Press, Jan. 5, 2009,
http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5g3Y3DBA09cm20SrlOg47GI4Ixp4gD95H5LI00

[29] “Seizing of the Palestinian weapons ship Karine A,” Israel Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Jan. 2, 2002, http://www.mfa.gov.il/MFA/Government/Communiques/2002/Seizing%20of%20the%20Palestinian%20weapons%20ship%20Karine%20A%20-

[30] Partlow, Joshua, “U.S.: Iran, Hezbollah Training Iraqi Militants,” The Washington Post, July 2, 2007,
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/07/02/AR2007070200174.html?hpid=topnews;
“U.S. commander: Iran still supports Iraq attacks,” USA Today, June 30, 2009,
http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/iraq/2009-06-30-odierno-iraq-iran_N.htm

[31] Gordon, Michael R.; Shane, Scott, “Behind U.S. Pressure on Iran, Long-Held Worry Over a Deadly Device in Iraq,” The New York Times, March 27, 2007

[32] Burns, John F., Gordon, Michael R., “U.S. Says Iran Helped Iraqis Kill Five G.I.’s,” The New York Times, July 3, 2007

[33] Wright, Robin, “Iranian Flow Of Weapons Increasing, Officials Say; Arms Shipments Tracked To Iraqi, Afghan Groups,” The Washington Post, June 3, 2007,
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/06/02/AR2007060201020.html

[34] “Iraqis find Iranian-made rockets after US attacked,” AP, Aug. 19, 2009, http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5hwK_CSpBxsNuVUEaDuOwmSSCiqGwD9A584680

[35] Rubin, Alissa J., “U.S. Suspects That Iran Aids Both Sunni and Shiite Militias,” The New York Times, A12, April 12, 2007

[36] “Iranian fighters tracked in Iraq, general says,” USA Today, Aug. 19, 2007,
http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/iraq/2007-08-19-fighters_N.htm

[37] “Police: Iranian fighters in southern Iraq,” UPI, Sept. 23, 2008,
http://www.upi.com/Emerging_Threats/2008/09/23/Police-Iranian-fighters-in-southern-Iraq/UPI-24701222206742/

[38] Straziuso, Jason; Daniszewski, John, “General: Iran aid to Taliban is strategic,” Newsday (Associated Press), June 12, 2006.

[39] Farmer, Ben, “Iranian Weapons Getting through to Taliban,” Telegraph, June 8, 2009, http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/afghanistan/5477283/Iranian-weapons-getting-through-to-Taliban.html;
Wright, Robin, “Iranian Flow Of Weapons Increasing, Officials Say; Arms Shipments Tracked To Iraqi, Afghan Groups,” The Washington Post, June 3, 2007;
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/06/02/AR2007060201020.html;
Blair, Tony, “What I’ve learned,” The Economist, May 31, 2007,
http://www.economist.com/opinion/displaystory.cfm?story_id=9257593

[40] Harding, Thomas, “Taliban ‘using missiles from Iran to target British troops,” The Daily Telegraph, May 22, 2007

[41] Joscelyn, Thomas, “Iran and the Taliban, allies against America,” The Long War Journal, July 28, 2009, http://www.longwarjournal.org/archives/2009/07/iran_and_the_taliban.php

[42] Levitt, Mathew A., “Islamic extremism in Europe,” Testimony to the Committee on International Relations Subcommittee on Europe and Emerging Threats, United States House of Representatives, April 7, 2005,
http://wwwa.house.gov/international_relations/109/lev042705.pdf

[43] McElroy, Damien, “Iran election: Tehran backs Hizbollah operations around world,” Telegraph, June 26, 2009, http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/iran/5651837/Iran-election-Tehran-backs-Hizbollah-operations-around-world.html;
Levitt, Mathew A., “Islamic extremism in Europe,” Testimony to the Committee on International Relations Subcommittee on Europe and Emerging Threats, United States House of Representatives, April 7, 2005,
http://wwwa.house.gov/international_relations/109/lev042705.pdf

[44] Sasinini, Guglielmo, “Hizballah Planned Attacks in Rome and Paris,” Libero, Jan. 31, 2008.

[45] “Iran’s new president glorifies martyrdom,” Middle East Media Research Institute, Special Dispatch No. 945, July 29, 2005, http://memri.org/bin/articles.cgi?Page=archives&Area=sd&ID=SP94505

[46] Colvin, Marie, Michael Smith and Sarah Baxter, “Iran suicide bombers ‘ready to hit Britain’,” The Sunday Times, April 16, 2006, http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article706132.ece

[47] Razi, Farhad, “20 Terrorist training camps in Iran uncovered,” Global Politician, March 1, 2006,
http://globalpolitician.com/articledes.asp?ID=1639&cid=2&sid=4

[48] Partlow, Joshua, “U.S.: Iran, Hezbollah Training Iraqi Militants,” The Washington Post, July 2, 2007,
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/07/02/AR2007070200174.html?hpid=topnews

[49] Jehl, Douglas, “U.S. Looks Away as Iran Arms Bosnia,” The New York Times, April 15, 1995,
http://www.nytimes.com/1995/04/15/world/us-looks-away-as-iran-arms-bosnia.html

[50] “More than 300 Iranian Intelligence operatives entered BiH from 2004 to 2007,” March 6, 2009,
http://www.necenzurirano.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1275&Itemid=1

[51] “Breakthrough made in ’94 Argentina bombing,” MSNBC, Nov. 9, 2005,
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/9983810/

[52] Murphy, Jarrett, “Beirut Barracks Attacks Remembered,” CBS News, Oct. 23, 2003, http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2003/10/23/world/main579638.shtml

[53] “Iranian Cabinet Nominee Wanted in Argentine Attack,” The New York Times, Aug. 21, 2009, http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/2009/08/21/world/AP-ML-Iran.html?_r=1

[54] “Hezbollah operation in S. America,” UPI, Aug. 13, 2009,
http://www.upi.com/Top_News/2009/08/13/Hezbollah-operating-in-S-America/UPI-43671250166246/

[55] Shiffer, Shimon, “Hezbollah suspected of setting up camp in Venezuela,” YnetNews, Aug. 13, 2009,
http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3761491,00.html

[56] Carter, Sara, “Exclusive: Hezbollah uses Mexican drug routes into U.S.,” The Washington Times, March 27, 2009, http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/mar/27/hezbollah-uses-mexican-drug-routes-into-us/

[57] Weinraub, Bernard, “U.S. Says C.I.A. Believes It Is Probable Higgins Was Killed Before Monday,” The New York Times, Aug. 3, 1989, http://www.nytimes.com/1989/08/03/world/us-says-cia-believes-it-is-probable-higgins-was-killed-before-monday.html

[58] Loyd, Anthony, “Tomb of the unknown assassin reveals mission to kill Rushdie,” Times Online, June 8, 2005, http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/article531110.ece

[59] “DPRK-Iranian Cultural and Scientific Exchange Plan Signed,” Korean Central News Agency, Jan. 19, 2007, http://www.kcna.co.jp/item/2007/200701/news01/20.htm

[60] Coughlin, Con, “N Korea helping Iran with nuclear testing,” Telegraph, Jan. 24, 2007,
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/1540429/N-Korea-helping-Iran-with-nuclear-testing.html

[61] Mohammed, Arshad, “North Korea may have aided Hezbollah, LTTE – U.S. report,” Reuters, Dec. 13, 2007, http://in.reuters.com/article/topNews/idINIndia-30964520071213

[62] “Report: Missile landed in Syrian market,” UPI, Aug. 15, 2009,
http://www.upi.com/Top_News/2009/08/15/Report-Missile-landed-in-Syrian-market/UPI-49681250310757/

The Israel Project is an international non-profit organization devoted to educating the press and the public about Israel while promoting security, freedom and peace. The Israel Project provides journalists, leaders and opinion-makers accurate information about Israel. The Israel Project is not related to any government or government agency.

Millions Pray for Persecuted Christians on International Day Of Prayer

November 8th, 2009

By Michelle A. Vu www.christianpost.com

Millions of Christians around the world are praying for their persecuted brothers and sisters in Christ today in observance of the International Day of Prayer for the Persecuted Church.

In its 14th year, IDOP is one of the largest prayer events in the world. Last year, an estimated half a million churches in 150 countries participated in the event, according to Open Doors, an international Christian ministry that supports persecuted believers.

“The International Day of Prayer for the Persecuted Church presents a tremendous opportunity for millions of people to make a difference in the lives of those being persecuted for their faith in countries like North Korea, Iran, Iraq, China, India and many more,” said Open Doors USA President and CEO Dr. Carl Moeller.

He noted that the number one request by persecuted believers is always for those living in freedom to pray for them.

“And on Nov. 8 we have the opportunity to collectively lift our petitions to the Lord on their behalf,” Moeller said.

According to Open Doors, an estimated 100 million Christians worldwide suffer from some form of persecution for their faith in Christ – ranging from interrogation to death. Millions more face discrimination and alienation.

The World Evangelical Alliance, the largest network of evangelicals in the world, cited Hebrews 13:3 as a reminder why Christians should pray on IDOP. The verse states: “Remember those in prison as if you were their fellow prisoners and those who are mistreated as if you yourselves were suffering.”

Godfrey Yogarajah, executive director of The Religious Liberty Commission of WEA, recalled recently visiting several widows of Christian leaders who were killed in the violence last year in India’s Orissa state. He said they had lost everything: their homes, their possessions and their husbands.

“’We have lost everything except our faith,’” Yogarajah recalled one widow telling him as she held her baby tightly. “’Pray that we stay strong and bring up our children in the faith for which their fathers gave their lives.’”

Last year, Hindu extremists carried out the worst religious persecution in India’s 60 years of democracy. At least 120 people were murdered, 250 churches destroyed and over 50,000 individuals displaced in Orissa, India.

Jubilee Campaign USA, an advocacy group for persecuted Christians, says while IDOP is a time to pray for persecuted, it also serves another purpose.

“It is also a time to pray for the souls of the oppressors, the nations that promote persecution, and those who ignore it,” wrote Ann Buwalda, director of Jubilee Campaign USA, in an e-mail newsletter.

Jubilee Campaign along with WEA and Open Doors all call for prayers especially for North Korea, where Christians are persecuted the most.

Open Doors, which has ranked North Korea as the worst religious freedom violator for seven years in a row, estimates that the totalitarian regime detains at least 200,000 political and religious prisoners – more than any other country in the world. An estimated 40,000 to 60,000 of the prisoners are thought to be Christians.

Christians living in free countries are also asked to pray specifically for Iranian converts Maryam Rostampour, 27, and MarziehAmirizadeh Esmaeilabad, 30, who have been held in an Iranian prison for eight months for their faith.

Despite deteriorating physical health and psychological pressure, both women have refused to recant their faith in Jesus Christ.

Open Doors USA launched a campaign this past week to urge Iran to immediately release the two women.

“Each year, The International Day of Prayer for the Persecuted Church gives us the privilege of joining together with over half a million churches in 150 countries to pray for the suffering church,” WEA’s Yogarajah said.

“It plays a vital role in encouraging and strengthening the persecuted church and also awakening churches in places where there is no persecution,” he added.

To get more churches involved, Open Doors is providing free resources including church bulletin inserts, a Power Point slide, facts for pastors, and list of suggested activities.

Other groups currently active in serving the persecuted Church include Christian Freedom International, Christian Solidarity Worldwide, Gospel for Asia, International Christian Concern, and The Voice of the Martyrs, among others.

Photo from Dachau

November 8th, 2009

By Rabbi Tzvi Nightingale,  www.aish.com

Was that my father standing behind the barbed wire?

Looking through some photographs I found inside a drawer
I was taken by a photograph of you
There were one or two I know that you would have liked a little more
But they didn’t show your spirit quite as true
-Jackson Browne

My father has three birthdays. Yes, three. His biological birthday is May 10, 1924. When he came to Canada after the war, he was too old to qualify as an orphan, so he had to rearrange his age a bit and make himself younger. 5/10/24 became 10/5/27 and he was now born on October 5, 1927. (Please don’t tell the Canadian government about this. I would hate to see him deported at this stage of his life.) Oddly, our family has been celebrating this completely fictitious birthday ever since.

My father was finally liberated from Dachau on April 29, 1945.

But it is his third birthday that he speaks about with the most emotion; the one that carries the most meaning for him. He spent years in various forced labor and death camps after his town of Staszow, Poland was liquidated by the Nazis in 1942. He was finally liberated on April 29, 1945 from Dachau concentration camp in Germany. My father has never been one to speak at length about his experiences as a survivor of the Holocaust, but he does talk about this one particular day. Among other things, I have heard him praise the American army for quickly delousing the inmates soon after they freed the camp. Being free from the Nazi hell and from the lice that infested his body for so long gave him a new lease on life.

The day after Yom Kippur I went to my office and did what I do after every Yom Kippur — not much. Not only am I tired from the fasting and teaching, but truth be told, I find the next day to be a bit of a downer. After intensely thinking about life, God, goals and being a better person, and trying to inspire 150 people who come to our Aish center for services, I am just not up to the everyday mundane grind that comes rushing back. So trying to recapture some of the seriousness and meaning of Yom Kippur, I found myself on YouTube and typed in “Dachau” in the search box. The top of the list was a film called Dachau Concentration Camp Liberation.

It was not a sophisticated piece, by any means. It consisted of photos slowly being panned to the background music from Schindler’s List. There were photos of soldiers approaching the camp and arresting surrendering Nazis, a bird’s eye view of the camp and photos of the main entrance and a gate with the infamous Arbeit Macht Frei.

A picture appeared of an American soldier walking on a wall perpendicular to a building, and I wondered, If my father were to see this short film, would he remember some of the structures and buildings? I briefly thought of showing him the film but knew I would not follow through due to his extreme sensitivity whenever the subject of the Holocaust comes up. In all the years I have known my dad, I have only heard snippets here and there.

At 1:50 into the film a photo appeared that made me hit the pause button. It was a relatively clear photo, a close up of sorts, of three inmates behind barbed wire, all smiling and waving — presumably at their saviors. The short man on the left has an overcoat, obviously given to him by one of the soldiers. The man on the right with the moustache is taller and appears to be saluting. They are wearing the familiar striped concentration camp garb.

And the man in the middle looks like my father.

Could this really be my father?

I began to stare intensely and analyze every detail of the physical features to see if they match my dad’s. The widow’s peak hairline, the shape of the face, the somewhat larger ear, the gap between his front teeth — all were consistent with his look. Could it be? Could this really be him? I kept asking myself. But the trait that made me think it was him the most was the shape of his waving hand. I have always noticed this about my father, how his index finger curls and seems slightly raised higher than his middle fingers and how his thumb comes to almost meet them. Today, thanks to his arthritis, his hand is almost frozen in that position, and this was the shape of the hand of the man in this photo.

I immediately emailed the link to my three brothers in Toronto with the subject line, “Something very weird” and told them to pause the film and tell me what they think. By next morning, they agreed that this could indeed be our father in the photo.

Then things got a little complicated. We were faced with the dilemma of showing this photo to my father. Will it bring back too many painful memories? Should we subject him to an image of himself from so long ago of the most horrible time in his life? What effect would possibly seeing himself in Nazi prisoner garb have on his psyche?

My oldest brother, Reuben, has always been closest to my father ever since he went to work for him in his meat packing plant at the age of 15. My dad gave him the most noxious job there to discourage him from working at Grace Meats, but packing tripe did not turn Reuben away. They have been very tight ever since. Reuben felt that we should think this through and “sit on it” for a while. “He has not seen the photo for all these years, another day or so will not change things.”

Sid, the next oldest brother and the peacemaker in our family, agreed. Murray and I wanted to show it to him but for the time being we deferred to the elder siblings. But the following day Murray came up with a Solomonic solution: Let’s show the picture to my dad’s one surviving sibling, Henya, who was with him in the camps earlier in the war and would be able to recognize if this indeed was him.

Murray called me that morning on his way to Auntie Henya. I told him to call me on my cell as soon as he spoke with her. Murray called me at 12:30 pm. “She was unequivocal – it’s him. And not only that, but the man standing next to him with the overcoat was his childhood friend, Herschel D.”

With that Murray then called my dad and asked if he wished to see a photo of himself on the day of his liberation from Dachau. He did. Murray went up to his condo and showed him the picture. With tears in his eyes my father declared, “Yeah, that’s me.”

On April 29, 1945 a handful of photos of the liberation of Dachau were taken by Robert Spring, an X-Ray technician serving with the 59th Evacuation Hospital of the U.S. Army Medical Corps. There were 32,000 inmates on that day and most of the photos taken by soldiers were of men too skeletal to discern their identities, too grainy to see any specific faces, or group shots taken from far away. But Mr. Spring decided to take one photo of a random group of nameless survivors whom he would never see again.To the Nazis, the man in the photo was prisoner number 147 963 and for 64 years and five months it was a photo of a nameless prisoner experiencing freedom for the first time in many years.

On the day after Yom Kippur in the year 5770, Tuesday September 29, 2009, it was discovered that the smiling inmate in Nazi prisoner garb was not just prisoner 147 963 , and he was not a random nameless survivor that a heroic soldier happened to capture on camera. He was born Icek Nachtigal, Yitzchak Dovid ben Reuvain, and he goes by the name of Irving Nightingale. He was born on May 10, 1924 but he will tell you that his real birthday is April 29, 1945.

And he is my father.

The photo we found.

The photo we found.

1-1-1NightingaleFamily

Saudis Ask For Aid If Pertodollars Decline

November 6th, 2009

Two stories follow, provoking a little less sympathy for the OPEC oil sheiks’ request.

Story 1:

Sheik flies Lamborghini 6,500 miles to Britain for oil change

By Neil Syson, The Sun www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/article1493291.ece

Flashy ... the Lamborghini is same model as Batman’s

Flashy ... the Lamborghini is same model as Batman’s

Oil be blowed ... the supercar at Heathrow with Qatar Airways jet

Oil be blowed ... the supercar at Heathrow with Qatar Airways jet

A rich Arab sent his Lamborghini on a 6,500-mile round trip to Britain for a service.

The £190,000 supercar was put on a scheduled flight from Qatar to Heathrow – then flown BACK after the oil check.

Money was no object as the flight would have cost the owner – thought to be a Sheikh – around £20,000.

The move sparked fury from green campaigners.

An airport worker said: “This car doesn’t have a carbon footprint – more of a crater.”

The overall cost of sending the Lamborghini to London for the oil change would have cost more than £23,000.

His black-and-gold supercar costs £3,552 to service at an approved dealer – on top of the £20,000 to freight from Qatar to Britain.

The Murciélago LP640 – driven by Batman in movie The Dark Knight – arrived from the Middle Eastern country on Friday.

It cleared customs and was trucked to specialist mechanics in London for the service.

On Monday it was flown back 3,250 miles to the oil-rich state where it was collected by the owner.

A cargo handler at Heathrow blasted the car’s environmental damage.

He said: “It would have been far more efficient to fly mechanics out there.”

And Jenny Evans, of pressure group Plane Stupid, said: “This horrifies me. It is another example of how rich people exploit and pollute the planet because of their money.”

She said the role of the super-wealthy in climate change was not properly recognised – while poor people were rapped for going on holiday.

Friends of the Earth’s transport campaigner Richard Dyer said: “Flying a car thousands of miles for a service is ludicrous when planes are one of the most polluting ways to transport goods. We urge the individual to get their car serviced closer to home.”

But David Price, of Lamborghini Club UK, said: “If an owner wants to service his car in that way, it is his choice.

“I’m not surprised. Thankfully the age of excess in some areas continues.”

Lamborghini UK spokeswoman Juliet Jarvis said there could be “kudos” for a Middle Eastern owner in servicing a car in London.

She said the exclusive Italian brand had a network of authorised dealers around the world – and most cars were looked after in the country where they were bought.

But she added: “This sort of thing is not unheard of.”

Qatar Airways confirmed it carried the Lamborghini.

The cars are popular with celebs including Rod Stewart and David Beckham.

Story 2:

The Sultan’s 5,000 personal vehicles

www.sacarfan.co.za/2009/02/whos-personal-car-collection-numbers-over-5000/

If you were rich enough to drive any car you wanted, absolutely any car, and money is no object, what would you go for? A Lamborghini, Bugatti, Mercedes, Aston Martin, or how about something outrageous like a Formula 1 car.

Sultan’s palace

Sultan’s palace

But what if you were truly rich, not just “getting by” like Bill Gates or Sir Richard Branson, but truly rich. The Sultan of Brunei is the richest man on earth; he is not counted on rich lists because he does not earn his money it comes from his tiny country’s oil reserves which are essentially his. Estimates of his wealth pop up from time to time but the truth is that no one really knows how much money he has.

Sultan of Brunei

Sultan of Brunei

So which car do you think the richest man in the world drives, well if you said Lamborghini, you’d be correct, if you said Aston Martin that would be right too, and if you guessed F1 Race-car you would have been nearly right because he owns every Formula One championship-winning car for the last thirty years.

Sultan’s garage

Sultan’s garage

These cars fit very nicely into his garage which is a bit bigger than your garage at home, it has to be to be able to accommodate the estimated 5000 personal vehicles owned by the Sultan. If he picked one car to drive down to his local corner café for bread and milk each day, it would take him thirteen and a half years to use each one.

Outside the Sultan’s garage

Outside the Sultan’s garage

He seems to quite like the Rolls Royce range he has over 500 hundred of those, if you tried unsuccessfully to buy a Rolls during the 1990’s that would be because he accounted for over half of their entire sales for that decade.

Ferrari FX

Ferrari FX

His collection, which may well be far more than 5000 vehicles, is estimated to have cost over US$4 billion. Filling them all up may be a little expensive, at $1 per litre that’s estimated at a minimum of half a million US dollars.

Mercedes F400

Mercedes F400

Those that voted for the Lamborghini will be happy to know that he has 20 of those, but he seems to prefer the sleeker appearance of the Ferrari’s as he opted for 367 of those, Jaguars are nice little run-arounds, all 177 of them, as are the 362 Bentleys.

Mercedes CLK-GTR

Mercedes CLK-GTR

He’s also not into buying boring, run-of-the-mill BMW’s (185 of them) and likes something a bit more exotic such as the Bentley Dominator 4X4 and Bentley Java, Ferrari FX (6), the worlds only right hand drive Mercedes CLK-GTR and the Cizeta Moroder V16T (3).

Cizeta Moroder V16T

Cizeta Moroder V16T

Added to the burden of deciding which car to use each day a visitor of the sultan’s garage’s once said: “It can take an hour and a half just to get a certain car out if it’s been parked right at the back.”

The letters of Dodd: Too many Jews here at the Nuremberg trials

November 6th, 2009

By Shmuel Rosner– Chief U.S. Correspondent, www.Haaretz.com

(written in 2007 when Letters From Nuremberg was first published)

There are too many Jews around here, thought the prosecutor, Thomas Dodd. “Col. Kaplan is now here, as a mate I assume for Commander Kaplan. Dr. Newman has arrived… it is all a silly business.” In the prosecution team of the Nuremberg trials, in which Nazi high officials are indicted, there is no need for such number of Jews, that’s what Dodd was thinking. “One would expect that some of these people would have sense enough to put an end to this kind of parade.”

“Grace, my dearest one,” thus Dodd opens many of his letters from those stormy days to his wife. They are very personal, and let the reader peep into the nature of relationships between Thomas and Grace. But these letters also constitute a fascinating historical documentation of the many back stage events of the Nuremberg trials. Dodd was the right hand man of Judge Robert Jackson, the leading prosecutor. He later became a Congressman and a Senator. The letters he sent are now published in a new book, Letters from Nuremberg, authored by his son, Connecticut Senator Chris Dodd, with the help of a friend, Lary Bloom. One should assume that timing it is no mere coincidence: Dodd is now running for President.

Focusing of the too-much-Jews letter doesn’t do justice to Dodd. There’s no reason to believe that he didn’t want them around him because of personal dislike or racist prejudice. “You know how I have despised anti-Semitism,” he writes to his wife, who stayed at home, in the US, while he was spending more than a year abroad. The trials failed to make the case against the Nazi persecution of the Jews. They were blamed for war crimes, but left unspoken the truth about the nature of the war they have declared against one particular nation.

“Jews should stay away from this trial – for their own sake,” Dodd explains. He doesn’t want them to supply anti-Semites and isolationists with ammunition – afraid of a possible growing sentiment to describe the war as “war for the Jews.” His son, the Senator, added a foot note reminding readers of comment made by Charles Lindbergh, leading the anti-war movement, back in 1941. Three forces are pushing America to get involved in the war, he said: The Brits, the President, the Jews.

Senator Dodd told me that he doesn’t necessarily agree with the sentiment articulated by his father in the letter sited above. He is convinced, though, that this was an honest assessment. Thomas Dodd really thought the number of Jewish members in the team was bad for the Jews themselves. There was no doubt in the son’s mind that the letters should be published in full, not censored. While speaking to three Jewish reporters about the book, he focused more on its political implications, in the broader sense, that on the events of those long-gone times.

Much more than the content of any letter, this is the really controversial side of this book. The son is using the father’s writings to promote his beliefs regarding foreign policy, the international law, human rights. Quoting them, he is trying building a case against the Bush administration, blaming it for a “fundamental shift” in America’s policy, as far as international norms of justice and the rule of law are concerned. Dodd argues that there’s a stark difference between the way America chose to react to the crimes of the Nazis, hence, his fathers’ letters, and the path it has taken after the events of September 11. In conversation, Dodd agrees that the differences between now and then are more than cosmetic. However, the first part of the book is mostly dedicated to drawing the political lessons he sees fit.

“Civilized nations respond differently,” Dodd says, armed with the proof: these newly released letters. Civilized nations do not execute, hold people in secret prisons indefinitely, circumvent the courts – but rather prosecute. The letters show that this is what the father believed. But most of them don’t deal with politics, or philosophy, but rather describe the daily struggles of a man in a unique position. In the morning, he was questioning Hitler’s deputy, Rudolph Hess; in the evening writing about it to his wife, “He is gone mentally and I doubt that he can answer for his offenses.” In the next letter he describes an encounter between Hess and Herman Goering, the Air-Force chief and second in command to the Fuhrer. “Don’t you recall me?” he asks Hess. “I am really very sorry,” Hess replies. “It is genuine,” writes Dodd. He really couldn’t recognize him.

In one of the most dramatic moments of this trial, Dodd was the one presenting to the world the shrunken head of a Polish prisoner. The photo depicting him holding this dreadful piece of evidence is still memorable. The head was used as a paper holder at the office of a Nazi officer. But from the letters, one learns about the personal relations that developed between Dodd and some defendants. Franz Von Papen, short-time deputy to Hitler and one of the few to be found not guilty at the end of the trial, is called “my friend Papen.”

Dodd the father died relatively young, at the age of 64. His political career ended in turmoil and he was censured by the Senate for personal usage of public funds. His son, as one expects, wants this book to serve as a tribute to the better days of the father (he had many good days and some achievements as a legislator too). He said that publishing the letters now, a decade after they were discovered, is the culmination of a long and slow process. There are many family members involved, and making decisions takes time. If he doesn’t mention the campaign as a reason, one should assume that it is only because this will be just stating the obvious.

No dramatic revelations can be found in this book. But it is a fascinating history lesson, and a great way to learn more about the people taking part in the trial of the century. And as it is always with people, much space is dedicated to rivalries, maneuvers, egos. “The worst of [Colonel Robert] Gill, however, is his disloyalty to Jackson,” writes Dodd about one member of the team. But he also remembers that this is not the everyday trial, that he is playing a part in one great drama. “I like the assignment,” he writes. “It is an important and worthwhile one.”