By: Ann Coulter
The amazing part of the great Danish cartoon caper isnt that Muslims immediately engage in acts of mob violence when things dont go their way. That is de rigueur for the Religion of Peace. Their immediate response to all bad news is mass violence. Thats a “dog bites man” story and belongs on page B-34, next to the grade school hot-lunch menu and the birth notices.
After an Egyptian ferry capsized recently, killing hundreds of passengers, a whole braying mob of passengers relatives staged an organized attack on the company, throwing furniture out the window and burning the building to the ground. Witnesses say it was the most violent ocean liner-related incident since Carnival Cruise Lines fired Kathie Lee Gifford.
The “offense to Islam” ruse is merely an excuse for Muslims to revert to their default mode: rioting and setting things on fire. These people have a serious anger management problem.
So its not exactly a scoop that Muslims are engaging in violence. A front-page story would be “Offended Muslims Remain Calm.”
What is stunning about this spectacle is that their violence is working. With a few exceptions, the media wont show the cartoons that incited mass violence around the globe (cartoons available at www.anncoulter.com). And yet, week after week, American patriots endure “The Boondocks” without complaint. Wheres the justice here?
Perhaps we could put aside our national, ongoing, post-9/11 Muslim backside kissing contest and get on with the business at hand: Bombing Syria back to the stone age and then permanently disarming Iran.
The mass violence by Muslims over some cartoons reminds us why we have to worry when countries like Iran start talking about having nukes. Iran is led by a lunatic who makes a big point of denying the Holocaust. Indeed, in response to the Muhammad cartoons, one Iranian newspaper is soliciting cartoons about the Holocaust. (So far the only submissions have come from Ted Rall, Garry Trudeau and The New York Times.)
Iran is certainly implying that it has nukes. Maybe they do, maybe they dont, but you cant take chances with berserk psychotics. What if they start having one of these bipolar episodes with a nuclear bomb?
If you dont want to get shot by the police, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, then dont point a toy gun at them. Or, as I believe our motto should be after 9-11: Jihad monkey talks tough; jihad monkey takes the consequences. Sorry, I realize thats offensive. How about “camel jockey”? What? Now whatd I say? Boy, you tent merchants sure are touchy. Grow up, would you?
In addition, I believe we are legally required to be bombing Syria right now. And unlike the Korans alleged prohibition on depictions of Muhammad, Ive got documentation to back that up!
Muslims in Syria torched the Danish Embassy a few weeks ago, burning it to the ground. According to everyone, the Syrian government was behind the attack — the prime minister of Denmark, Condoleezza Rice and White House spokesman Scott McClellan. I think even the gals on “The View” have acknowledged that Damascus was behind this one.
McClellan said: “We will hold Syria responsible for such violent demonstrations since they do not take place in that country without government knowledge and support.”
We are signatories to a treaty that requires us to do more than “hold Syria responsible” for this attack. Syria has staged a state-sponsored attack on our NATO partner on Danish soil, the Danish Embassy. According to the terms of the NATO treaty, the United States and most of Europe have an obligation to go to war with Syria.
Or is NATO — like the conventions of civilized behavior, personal hygiene and grooming — inapplicable when Muslims are involved? Liberals complain about “unilateral action,” but under the terms of a treaty created by Dean Acheson and the Democrats, France, Germany, Spain and Greece are all obliged to go to war with us against Syria. Why, its almost like a coalition! OK, Mr. Commie: Saddle up!