By Phyllis Chesler, www.TimesOnline.co.uk
Once I was held captive in Kabul. I was the bride of a charming, seductive, and Westernized Afghan Muslim whom I met at an American college. The purdah I experienced was relatively posh but the sequestered all-female life was not my cup of chai nor was the male hostility to veiled, partly veiled, and unveiled women in public.
When we landed in Kabul, an airport official smoothly confiscated my U.S. passport. Dont worry, its just a formality, my husband assured me. I never saw that passport again. I later learnt that this was routinely done to foreign wives perhaps to make it impossible for them to leave. Overnight, my husband became a stranger. The man with whom I had discussed Camus, Dostoevsky, Tennessee Williams and the Italian cinema became a stranger. He treated me the same way his father and elder brother treated their wives: distantly, with a hint of disdain and embarrassment.
In our two years together, my future husband had never once mentioned that his father had three wives and 21 children. Nor did he tell me that I would be expected to live as if I had been reared as an Afghan woman. I was supposed to lead a largely indoor life among women, to go out only with a male escort and to spend my days waiting for my husband to return or visiting female relatives, or having new (and very fashionable) clothes made.
In America, my husband was proud that I was a natural-born rebel and freethinker. In Afghanistan, my criticism of the treatment of women and of the poor rendered him suspect, vulnerable. He mocked my horrified reactions. But I knew what my eyes and ears told me. I saw how poor women in chadaris were forced to sit at the back of the bus and had to keep yielding their place on line in the bazaar to any man.
I saw how polygamous, arranged marriages and child brides led to chronic female suffering and to rivalry between co-wives and half-brothers; how the subordination and sequestration of women led to a profound estrangement between the sexes one that led to wife-beating, marital rape and to a rampant, but hotly denied, male prison-like homosexuality and pederasty; how frustrated, neglected, and uneducated women tormented their daughters-in-law and female servants; how women were not allowed to pray in mosques or visit male doctors (their husbands described the symptoms in their absence).
Individual Afghans were enchantingly courteous but the Afghanistan I knew was a bastion of illiteracy, poverty, treachery, and preventable diseases. It was also a police state, a feudal monarchy, and a theocracy, rank with fear and paranoia. Afghanistan had never been colonized. My relatives said: Not even the British could occupy us. Thus I was forced to conclude that Afghan barbarism was of their own making and could not be attributed to Western imperialism.
Long before the rise of the Taliban, I learnt not to romanticize Third World countries or to confuse their hideous tyrants with liberators. I also learnt that sexual and religious apartheid in Muslim countries is indigenous and not the result of Western crimes and that such colorful tribal customs are absolutely, not relatively, evil. Long before al Qaeda beheaded Daniel Pearl in Pakistan and Nicholas Berg in Iraq, I understood that it was dangerous for a Westerner, especially a woman, to live in a Muslim country. In retrospect, I believe my so-called Western feminism was forged in that most beautiful and treacherous of Eastern countries.
Nevertheless, Western intellectual-ideologues, including feminists, have demonized me as a reactionary and racist Islamophobe for arguing that Islam, not Israel, is the largest practitioner of both sexual and religious apartheid in the world, and that if Westerners do not stand up to this apartheid, morally, economically and militarily, we will not only have the blood of innocents on our hands; we will also be overrun by Sharia in the West. I have been heckled, menaced, never-invited, or disinvited for such heretical ideas and for denouncing the epidemic of Muslim-on-Muslim violence for which tiny Israel is routinely, unbelievably scapegoated.
However, my views have found favor with the bravest and most enlightened people alive. Leading secular Muslim and ex-Muslim dissidents from Egypt, Bangladesh, Iran, Iraq, Jordan, Pakistan, and Syria and exiles from Europe and North America assembled for the landmark Islamic Summit Conference in Florida and invited me to chair the opening panel.
According to the chair of the meeting, Ibn Warraq: What we need now is an Age of Enlightenment in the Islamic world. Without critical examination of Islam, it will remain dogmatic, fanatical and intolerant and will continue to stifle thought, human rights, individuality, originality and truth. The conference issued a declaration calling for such a new Enlightenment. The declaration views Islamophobia as a false allegation, sees a noble future for Islam as a personal faith, not a political doctrine and demands the release of Islam from its captivity to the ambitions of power-hungry men.
Now is the time for Western intellectuals who claim to be antiracists and committed to human rights to stand with these dissidents. To do so requires that we adopt a universal standard of human rights and abandon our loyalty to multicultural relativism, which justifieseven romanticizesindigenous Islamist barbarism, totalitarian terrorism and the persecution of women, religious minorities, homosexuals, and intellectuals. Our abject refusal to judge between civilization and barbarism, and between enlightened rationalism and theocratic fundamentalism, endangers and condemns the victims of Islamic tyranny.
Ibn Warraq has written a devastating work that will be out by the summer. It is entitled Defending the West: A Critique of Edward Saids Orientalism. Will Western intellectuals also dare to defend the West?
Phyllis Chesler is a Professor Emerita of Psychology and Womens Studies at the City University of New York.