Christianity Through Jewish Eyes

Home » Levitt Letter » Levitt Letter Extra News

Important articles that didn't make the Levitt Letter

Archive for April, 2009

Israel Tests Anti-Ballistic Missile System

Tuesday, April 7th, 2009
An Arrow missile, part of an anti-missile system, is launched in a test off Israel's Mediterranean coast in central Israel in this Sunday Jan. 5, 2003, file photo. Israeli defense officials say Tuesday, April 7, 2009, the country has successfully tested the Arrow anti-missile system, aimed at protecting the country from attack by Iran. (AP Photo/Eitan Hess-Ashkenazi)

An Arrow missile, part of an anti-missile system, is launched in a test off Israel's Mediterranean coast in central Israel in this Sunday Jan. 5, 2003, file photo. Israeli defense officials say Tuesday, April 7, 2009, the country has successfully tested the Arrow anti-missile system, aimed at protecting the country from attack by Iran. (AP Photo/Eitan Hess-Ashkenazi)

By Matti Friedman

JERUSALEM (AP) — Israel successfully tested an anti-missile system designed to protect the country from attack by Iran, the Defense Ministry said Tuesday, April 7.

The intercept of a dummy missile was the latest test of the Arrow system, a U.S.-Israeli joint venture. Israeli defense officials said the interceptor was an upgraded Arrow II, designed to counter Iran’s Shahab ballistic missile.

Representatives of the Pentagon were present at the test, the officials said, speaking on condition of anonymity pending an official announcement.

In a statement, the Defense Ministry said the interceptor shot down “a missile simulating a ballistic threat in especially challenging conditions.”

It called the test “an important step in the development program and the development of operational abilities to counter the growing threat of ballistic missiles in the region.” Defense Minister Ehud Barak watched Tuesday’s intercept from a military helicopter, the ministry said.

Israel believes Iran is developing nuclear weapons that could pose an existential threat to the Jewish state. Iran denies that and says its nuclear work is for peaceful purposes such as energy production.

Israel has threatened military action, and Iran has said it would strike back, warning last month that Israel’s own nuclear facilities were within missile range.

The Arrow project is being developed by Israel Aircraft Industries and Chicago-based Boeing Co. at a cost of more than $1 billion. It was spurred largely by the failure of the U.S. military’s Patriot missiles to intercept Iraqi Scud rockets that struck Israel in the 1991 Gulf War.4-7-09-map-of-me

Several batteries of Arrow missiles are already operational.

Iran’s Shahab-3 missiles have a range of up to 1,250 miles (2,000 kilometers), putting Israel within striking distance.

Iran has worked hard to increase the accuracy of its missiles. In November, it successfully test-fired the Sajjil, a solid fuel high-speed missile with a range 1,250 miles. Solid fuel is considered a significant breakthrough because it increases accuracy.

Israel is also developing a system to counter short and medium range rockets of the kind possessed by Palestinian and Lebanese militants. The system, called the Iron Dome, is set to be deployed next year.

Tel Aviv Celebrates Its 100th Anniversary

Saturday, April 4th, 2009

By Or Barnea, www.YNetNews.com

 Around 100,000 people arrived Saturday night, April 4th,  at the opening celebration of Tel Aviv-Jaffa’s 100th anniversary, gathering around a giant stage equipped with massive video screens that was erected earlier in the day at Rabin Square.   

The opening act was the Israeli Philharmonic Orchestra, immediately followed by Mayor Ron Huldai, who officially kicked off the celebration.

Giant screens show video clips (Photo: Yaron Brener)

Giant screens show video clips (Photo: Yaron Brener)

 

The artists who later took the stage were all accompanied by the orchestra. Among them were Barry Sakharof, Miri Mesika, the band Monica Sex, Danny Robas, Dana International, Matti Caspi, Shlomo Gronich, and others. 

 

 Video clips were shown on the large screens throughout the evening, while the sky lit up with impressive fireworks displays. As singer Alona Daniel sang her hit, ‘On the Roofs of Tel Aviv’, a number of rock bands were seen playing on the rooftops surrounding the square. 

Fireworks light up the sky (Photo: Yaron Brener)

Fireworks light up the sky (Photo: Yaron Brener)

 Aside from musical performances, a number of circus performers and dancers were in attendance and presented feats dedicated to the city, its streets, and even its athletic teams. 

 Despite the notorious global recession, Tel Aviv’s municipality invested almost $1 million in the festive event.

 The night was concluded with a dance party that is expected to go on until the morning. The show was merely the beginning of the anniversary celebrations, scheduled to go on until the end of the year.

Giant screens show video clips (Photo: Yaron Brener)

Giant screens show video clips (Photo: Yaron Brener)

Israel’s New Foreign Minister’s First Speech

Thursday, April 2nd, 2009

By Daniel Pipes, www.FrontPageMagazine.com

 

Avigdor Lieberman became foreign minister of Israel April 1, 2009. He celebrated his inauguration with a maiden speech that news reports indicate left his listeners grimacing, squirming, and aghast. The BBC, for example, informs us that his words prompted “his predecessor Tzipi Livni to interrupt and diplomats to shift uncomfortably.”

 

Too bad for them – the speech leaves me elated. Here are some of the topics Lieberman covered in his 1,100-word stem-winder:

 

The world order: The Westphalia order of states is dead, replaced by a modern system that includes states, semi-states, and irrational international players (e.g., Al-Qaeda, perhaps Iran).

 

World priorities: These must change. The free world must focus on defeating the countries, forces, and extremist entities “that are trying to violate it.” The real problems are coming from “the direction of Pakistan, Afghanistan, Iran and Iraq” – and not the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

 

Egypt: Lieberman praises Cairo as “a stabilizing factor in the regional system and perhaps even beyond that” but puts the Mubarak government on notice that he will only go there if his counterpart comes to Jerusalem.

 

Repeating the word “peace”: Lieberman poured scorn on prior Israeli governments: “The fact that we say the word ‘peace’ twenty times a day will not bring peace any closer.”

 

The burden of peace: “I have seen all the proposals made so generously by Ehud Olmert, but I have not seen any result.” Now, things have changed: “the other side also bears responsibility” for peace and must ante up.

 

The Road Map: The speech’s most surprising piece of news is Lieberman’s focus on and endorsement of the Road Map, a 2003 diplomatic initiative he voted against at the time but which is, as he puts it, “the only document approved by the cabinet and by the Security Council.” He calls it “a binding resolution” that the new government must implement. In contrast, he specifically notes that the government is not bound by the Annapolis accord of 2007 (“Neither the cabinet nor the Knesset ever ratified it”).

 

Implementing the Road Map: Lieberman intends to “act exactly” according to the letter of the Road Map, including its Tenet and Zinni sub-documents. Then comes one of his two central statements of the speech:

 

I will never agree to our waiving all the clauses – I believe there are 48 of them – and going directly to the last clause, negotiations on a permanent settlement. No. These concessions do not achieve anything. We will adhere to it to the letter, exactly as written. Clauses one, two, three, four – dismantling terrorist organizations, establishing an effective government, making a profound constitutional change in the Palestinian Authority. We will proceed exactly according to the clauses. We are also obligated to implement what is required of us in each clause, but so is the other side. They must implement the document in full.

 

The mistake of making concessions: He notes the “dramatic steps and made far-reaching proposals” of the Sharon and Olmert governments and then concludes, “But I do not see that [they] brought peace. To the contrary. … It is precisely when we made all the concessions” that Israel became more isolated, such as at the Durban Conference in 2001. Then follows his other central statement:

 

We are also losing ground every day in public opinion. Does anyone think that concessions, and constantly saying “I am prepared to concede,” and using the word “peace” will lead to anything? No, that will just invite pressure, and more and more wars. “Si vis pacem, para bellum” – if you want peace, prepare for war, be strong.

 

Israeli strength: Lieberman concludes with a rousing call to fortitude: “When was Israel at its strongest in terms of public opinion around the world? After the victory of the Six Day War, not after all the concessions in Oslo Accords I, II, III, and IV.”

 

Comments:

 

(1) I have had reservations about Lieberman and still do, but this speech has him off to a great start. Put as briefly as possible, he announced that “Israel is back.”

 

(2) Given that the formal name of the Road Map is “A Performance-Based Roadmap to a Permanent Two-State Solution to the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict,” I confess myself puzzled by the news reports (such as the one headlined in the Los Angeles Times, “Foreign minister says Israel not bound to follow two-state path”) declaring that Lieberman has pronounced the end of the two-state solution.

 

(3) There is much irony in Lieberman now championing the Road Map, an initiative he and many others of his outlook condemned at the time. For an authoritative discussion at the time of its origins, flaws, and implications, see the analysis by Daniel Mandel, “Four-Part Disharmony: The Quartet Maps Peace.”

Israel’s 32nd government sworn in

Wednesday, April 1st, 2009

By Shelly Paz and Tovah Lazaroff , The Jerusalem Post

Israel seeks peace with the entire Arab and Muslim world but continues to be threatened by the forces of Islamic extremists, Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu said several hours before he was sworn in Tuesday evening.

He took the oath of office just before midnight, after the Knesset voted 69-45 to approve the new government.

“These are irregular times,” Netanyahu told the Knesset plenum. “Today Israel is faced with two tests – an economic crisis and a security crisis. The source of these crises are neither our past actions nor past mistakes…. Our [current] actions, however, will determine the results of these crises.”

Netanyahu was interrupted numerous times by critics of his extra-large government as he presented it and its guidelines to the Knesset. In the past, Netanyahu himself expressed opposition to large governments due to the expense involved.

“It is not with a victor’s joy that I stand here today in front of you, but with a great sense of responsibility,” Netanyahu began. “I ask for your trust at this time of worldwide crisis of a kind we haven’t known before, and it is with a sense of worry, but also with hope and faith, that the State of Israel confronts two major challenges: the economic challenge and the security challenge. I am certain that the people of Israel will cope successfully with the challenges that lie ahead of it.”

Regarding Iranian threats to “erase Israel from the map,” Netanyahu criticized the international community for its lack of response.

“The Jewish people has experience with dictators and it cannot overestimate megalomaniac dictators who threaten to destroy it,” he said.

The new prime minister added that the worst thing for the State of Israel and the world would be “that a radical regime obtains nuclear weapons.”

The threat to Israel came from the spread of extremist Islam in the region and in the world, Netanyahu said.

“I separate extremist Islam from the general Muslim world, which is also threatened by extremist Islam,” he told the plenum. “The Muslim culture is a rich culture that knew times of prosperity, of Arabs and Jews who lived together and created things together.”

Six prime ministers had strived for peace with the Palestinians but failed, he said, adding that “the failure was not their fault. If the heads of the Palestinian Authority want peace, I tell them now – we can achieve it.”

Netanyahu said his government would work for peace with all of Israel’s neighbors on three levels: economic, political and security.

“We will carry out ongoing negotiations for peace with the Palestinians in an attempt to reach a permanent agreement,” he said. “We don’t want to rule another people, and the agreement will give the Palestinians all the rights to rule themselves, except for those that endanger Israel.”

Netanyahu also explained how his government would handle the “truly unprecedented” economic crisis, saying it threatened the livelihood of tens of thousands of Israelis and that no one could tell when and how it would end.

“But I know that the Israeli market has clear advantages that enable it to cope with many challenges,” he said. “The fact that we are a small country provides leverage in getting out of this crisis. The Israeli market is like a small and light speedboat whose direction can be changed more easily. I myself will lead this change of direction and the government I head will operate to protect work places, to resolve the shortage of credit in the market, and to maintain macroeconomic policies.”

Netanyahu also promised a revolution in the education system and set a goal to place Israel among the top 10 countries in the world within 10 years.

“From my experience, when you set a goal, a process to achieve the goal starts right away,” he said.

Netanyahu also discussed his plans to address the increase in crime, promising to strengthen the police, implement more severe punishments and advance reforms.

“It is unacceptable that the Jewish people, who were dispersed in more than a hundred countries in the Diaspora where they maintained high standards of morality, came back to their country where crime organizations that deal in murder, women and drug trafficking are emerging,” he said.

Netanyahu also said he was committed to the Declaration of Independence from 61 years ago, “including the obligation for full equality for all people regardless of their religion, gender and race.”

He praised departing prime minister Olmert and thanked him for the work he had done for the state, its security and its citizens.

Finally, Netanyahu read out the long list of ministers and deputy ministers that he asked the Knesset to approve – to loud catcalls from the opposition.

He explained that the coalition agreements had been checked with the relevant legal bodies, adding that when he was in the opposition, he had never shown disrespect for the Knesset.

He paused and look out to the spectators gallery where Aviva Schalit sat along with Karnit Goldwasser and Esther Wachsman.

Aviva’s son Gilad was kidnapped by Hamas in June 2006. Until two weeks ago, hopes had remained high that Olmert would find a way to conclude a prisoner swap with Hamas for Gilad’s return.

Now, it was Netanyahu’s turn to speak of prioritizing Gilad’s release.

It is right before Pessah, he said.

“At our national table, there is an empty chair. It is Gilad Schalit’s chair. I will do everything in my power to ensure his speedy return, healthy and whole, to his family’s bosom,” Netanyahu said.

Then he moved from a personal address to the Schalit and said that as an expression of his feelings as Pessah approaches, he had chosen to read to the plenum a portion of one of the last letters that his brother Yonatan had written before he was killed in July 1976 leading a raid in Entebbe, Uganda, to rescue hostages.

His brother, Netanyahu said, had written that Pessah was the best holiday, because it focused on the liberty of the Jews. The Jews had gone through many long years of suffering, oppression, vagrancy and degradation, Yonatan wrote.

For many years, there appeared to be no ray of light, but that is no longer true, he wrote.

This holiday is a testament to the eternal goal of freedom.

“Pessah awakens an emotional bond, because of the Seder, and like all of us, I recall old memories from my personal past,” Yonatan wrote.

But even, he said, as he reflected on his past, “I also see myself as an inseparable link in the chain of the existence and independence of Israel.”

Then Netanyahu continued where his brother had left off.

“Israeli citizens, in this fateful hour, we are all an integral link” in that chain.

“From this podium in Jerusalem, which is our eternal capital, I am uttering a prayer to God, to bless that the work of our hands will be blessed, and that the unity with which we started on our way will be a good sign… that will ensure our future.”

Kadima leader and outgoing foreign minister Tzipi Livni followed Netanyahu with a fiery speech that gave an indication of how her tenure as head of the opposition would be.

She criticized Netanyahu for the large government he had presented and warned that the public would soon tire of paying the heavy cost of the coalition’s stability.

“You imposed this pompous government on the ‘thin’ public, a government of ministers of nothing and deputy ministers for anything,” she said.

Livni attacked Israel Beiteinu chairman Avigdor Lieberman, as well as Netanyahu for giving Lieberman’s party ministries responsible for enforcing the law while its leader was facing criminal investigations.

She also accused the Labor party and its chairman, Defense Minister Ehud Barak, for joining the new government, accusing them of being stuck to their seats at the cabinet table.

In a speech that was a farewell to political life, Olmert said earlier that there had been an “unbearable gap between the criticism this [outgoing] government absorbed and its achievements,” although he added that he was leaving with no complaints or bitterness.

He talked about the main event of his tenure, the Second Lebanon War, and said that time was changing perspectives on the war, which eventually brought quiet to a border that had suffered rockets attacks between 2000 and 2006.

Olmert spoke of his partners in waging that war, thanking Labor MK Amir Peretz, at the time defense minister, whom he described as a “decent man,” and retired chief of General Staff Dan Halutz, “a noble man and a hero.”


Zola Levitt Presents
Levitt Letter
Tours
Podcasts